Passengers lock screaming toddler in airplane toilet to "educate" her

Originally published at: Passengers lock screaming toddler in airplane toilet to "educate" her - Boing Boing

10 Likes

Poor kid. Flying must be miserable for toddlers.

13 Likes

That means it worked! Problem solved! A+ parenting.

/s

14 Likes

Rather than it being free for kids under two to fly, it should cost extra.

Is there a source for this that isn’t the Daily Heil? They are the Newsmax of the UK.

10 Likes

Or, maybe parents could just leave their babies home all the time so as not upset all the real humans who decided not to be breeders… I mean, children aren’t actual people anyway, right? Not like a family with young children would EVER need to travel or certainly they’re all incredibly wealthy and can afford to travel and pay extra for what is clearly a privilege that they aren’t entitled to. Not like the right to travel is a human right or anything… /s

19 Likes

How would that have helped?

9 Likes

Why is it that so many people think it’s cool to diss young children or their parents for the crime of existing in public spaces? Yes, it’s not fun for anyone when a baby cries on a plane or in a store. No, that doesn’t mean that babies should be locked in soundproof chambers until they are ready to join adult society.

“Why should I have to endure presence of a young child? I hate babies!” is no more defensible a position than “Why should I have to endure the presence of an elderly person? Old people suck!” or “Why should I have to endure the presence of a person with developmental disabilities? They make me uncomfortable!”

15 Likes

The first time I took a flight I was old enough to understand that my ears popping was a normal, albeit uncomfortable, part of the experience. But it’s just one of at least a dozen things I can think of that a toddler wouldn’t understand and that could even be worse for a toddler.

9 Likes

Because infancy is a part of the human life cycle, and humans occasionally need to eat and travel and go outside?

12 Likes

Is it? Smoking is both a choice and actually harmful to people around you. Being a young child is more like being a neurodivergent person, in that through no fault of your own you don’t always know how to respond to social situations the same way as other people, and I sincerely hope you wouldn’t ask to restrict travel for them.

11 Likes

Just in case this absurd, false equivalency is a genuine question, because “smoker” is a description of behavior not identity. Being a smoker or not isn’t inherent to the person. They can choose not to be a smoker for the duration of a flight, for instance

9 Likes

Change the term “Black person” or “Jew”… shitting on entire groups of people who can’t change their nature or how society understands them is not cool. Ever. I don’t understand how anyone believes that to be the case, that children as okay to dismiss as less than… :woman_shrugging: Yes, it sucks to be near a crying baby. Imagine not being able to explain to everyone around you what’s bothering you, though. And no one can fully make you understand why your ears hurt all of a sudden…

8 Likes

Some grannies need to be checked for wolf-like characteristics.

6 Likes

That’s a great tagline for an advert.

7 Likes

Good reason to not let clueless parents (or grandparents, it seems) to take them on multi-hour torture binges.

Picking fights with fellow users will not end well.

Nor will being cruel about children.

Do better.

12 Likes