Dammit! You beat me to it. Well played.
Soā¦ how does the lower carās cable get to the top floor, since thereās another car above it?
I imagine the cables are offset with the attachment points near the sides instead of the center.
One canāt go to the ground floor. The other canāt go to the top floor. Suppose you want to go from ground to top?
If there was a space above the top floor for elevator storage and a likewise space below the bottom floor, you theoretically could.
Or perhaps the lower carās cable is just routed around the upper car with pulleys on itās side.
It seems that could lead to some issues with placement of cables and counter-weights, unless Iām misunderstanding.
Note the rightmost shaft.
Couldnāt you just have a pulley near the center of the roof and floor each, and two more at the edges, so the cable is routed around? Iām no engineer, so maybe thereās some issue with the cable lengths Iām overlooking, but the vector forces should be the same as if the cable when directly down through the car.
ETA: Oh, I see what you mean. How to get the weight passed the other car. Could they share a weight?
oh hell no. HELL NO.
The obvious solution, a vertical tram, doesnāt exist and I canāt figure out why.
The counter weights are going to need to move separately. I was mainly thinking about symmetry, and straight cable runs.
i believe the other cars are the counter weights?
That would cut down on the proposed independence of movement.
No more than any normal tram.
not if they moved in opposing pairs, with revolutionary software and cutting edge hitatchi design.
You could watch the video. Though it all sounds like my first sentence there, so mute it.
I did. Maybe I missed something. Hereās some marketing from the company that makes them. Note the counterweightsā¦
Oh. I didnāt realize we were talking about @nemomenās post the whole time and not the original. (Note, I was speaking about 2 cars independent in one shaft, as the original article sets out.)
Yeah. The circulating one is sort of neat too.