? ❓ ⚛ Questions. Questions? QUESTIONS!? ⚛ ❓?


#435

Because it’s fun?


#436

Fun?

YOU THINK THIS IS ABOUT FUN?

#FUN? IS THIS NOT QUESTIONS THREAD?

 

[kicks @SteampunkBanana into the internet k-hole]


#437

Does someone need a nap?


#438

Wait, isn’t this the Questions Two Electric Fun Boogaloo thread?


#439

why is @OtherMichael being such a meanie? doesn’t he know we love him?


#440

Aren’t I known for being no fun?


#441

Is ̳i̪t͏̤͖ ̻̘̗̱̙̝a̟̺̖̤̝͡s̮̞̦ ̤̥̜͎ͅm͙̤̞͎̫̯͔͝u͕͔͖̙̹̰̺͟c̤̞̳͉̗̲͡h̤͈̟̼̜ f̰ͅu̵͙͍͕̱̞̪̤n̺͔ ̲̦̤͖̪̕ą̭̻̹̣s͇ ͚͚̤̠p̯̲͖̬͈͎ͅr̪͝o͔͇̩͍g̶̺̹r̠̝̰͓̦͔ͅḁ̣̘̦m̼̼̼̳̞̀m͚͡i̲͚͍̳̘͘n̸g̼̼ ̸̝͖͈i̪̩n̮̲̻̳ ̩͙͍̘ͅA͕̠̝̼̙̣͉͞P̣̜̜̰̼̥̦L͕̱̫̟̙͉̱?͉̜̫̯ ̷̻̝͇͉̟͈Ò̠͇͍͎͇̲̝r̶͔̺̲̭ f̝͝o͎l͚̣̱̬͉ͅl̶̗͈̰̖̱̥o̻̥͎͔w͈͕̰͖͘i̴̥͎̖ǹ̬͍͕̠̞g͈͔͕̼̼ ̱͈͓͘C̢͔̪̦̺̖̙a̙̟n̘͙̼͉̣a͎̹̱͇͉̗̙dì̫̘̣͍̤̲͎a̕n̮̱̱̱͇͕͈-͔̣̯̺͡C̬͍͕͟h̙̲̳̗̺̣̳͠e̢̱̭̤̜ͅm̶̝̥i̝c̶͖̼a̢̫̜͕͚l̞͇͘ ̤̖̻̻̜͍̜ţ͕̘̫̘r̮̼̪̞a͇̙̳̺̯̳d̖̩̞i͓̣͞t͍̳̫͍̯̬ͅi̝̣͔̤̼̠͔o̰͘ṉ̷̠͙͙s͇̦̹͕̰͘ ̜(͖͉e̙͎s̛͍̟̗̬̗̥p̦̰̪̱͖͖͕ḛ̮̳̲̱̜͝c̪̙̲͢i͔̪̮̹̠a͇͙̟̱͉͠l͖̰͎̥̙l̙̼͔̞͍̬͘y̨̲ ̶͇͕̗͉͍w̖̦̰͘ͅh̼̰͎͎̩̬ͅe̲n͔̜ ̥̼̩̻͍̟ch͉͈̻͙̲͙̥a̬̩͉͟s̗̻͚̪̥e͎̫̫̤͞d̵̲̦ ̢̦̝̻ͅw̟͡i͇͖̯̞t̰̻̝͖̼͓̘h̴͍͔ ̮̟̥̞a̴ d͖̤r̡a͉̺̤̳̖m҉ ò͔̮͓̣̯f̛ ̳̖L̩̩̪͕͇̯a̧͎̹̟̲̗ͅg̛̳͔̱̝̼̟̳a̡͚vu̞͜l̸̫͈͉̱i̝̱̤͚͍̣n͙͈̱̜̹̥)?͍̜͇̩́


#442

?͍̜͇̩́


#443

APL’s a toddle; at least it ain’t MUMPS, right?


#444

When you have a language where sample code online is all offered in images since it can’t even be expressed in human writing, isn’t that a bit more than a toddle?


#445

MUMPS ain’t really human either, is it?


#446

And doesn’t APL get you out in the fresh air?


#447

What human wouldn’t delight in getting to do a job involving reading this?

You mean when you flee the office never to return?


#448

Can I start a trend of Lebowski’ing people when they seriously need to chillax?


#449

Hasn’t the fiddly crazyness of Clearcase administration tempted me to do that?


#450

Wow, how much of your job involves keying all that crazy stuff? What does it mean?!?


#451

Do you know how happy I am that my job doesn’t involve any APL (that’s poor @PatRx2) or MUMPS (though @anotherone does)?

I work in Ruby, Java, and C - isn’t this C from a Linux kernel module fairly intuitive?
if ((flags & TH_ACK) && ((flags & TH_SYN) == 0) && ((flags & TH_RST) == 0) && ((flags & TH_FIN) == 0)) { if (template && atomic_read(&template->capture_mode)) { if (window_probe == MODE_WINDOW_PROBE_TYPE) { log_msg(DBG_PACKETS | DBG_INFO, mk_msg("capture mode on, responding to window probe packet\n", 0)); window = 0; } else { log_msg(DBG_PACKETS | DBG_INFO, mk_msg("capture mode on, not window probe, not responding to packet\n", 0)); return 0; } } else { if (con->window) { window = con->window; } } }


#452

Would I be correct if I said yes, it is fairly intuitive? :upside_down:

Am I not more familiar/comfortable with really long nested formulas in Excel?


#453

Wasn’t it more like a banana who realized a personal time-out was a good idea, but is someone we are all very much looking forward to “seeing” again around these parts?


#454

Wouldn’t it be forthcoming of me to admit that I do not know about that to which you are referring?

Was that not before my time?

ETA:

How many of you natives here are programmers or are in some way affiliated with IT?