You have no evidence that Hillary Clinton has ever used her position as First Lady, a U.S. Senator or Secretary of State to pass or champion legislation that financially benefited Wall Street, to the extent that it was illegal or corrupt.
The suggestion because Hillary gave a paid speech on Wall Street, means she is and can be corrupt–is simply presumptive, speculative and characteristic of what Hillary labeled “a artful smear.”
We know from Hillary Clinton’s tax returns from numerous years–that there is nothing in her tax returns that show she is “on and under” the financial take, dole and command of Wall Street.
We do not know what is in the tax returns of Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, covering numerous years–and whether their tax returns reveal they are “on and under” the financial take, dole and command of Wall Street.
After all it was not Hillary Clinton who voted to deregulate Wall Street, it was Bernie Sanders. It is also a fact that Hillary’s plan to reign in Wall Street is tougher and more punitive than Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump (who to my knowledge has no plan).
