8 Likes
11 Likes
10 Likes
(not really the Beatles)
9 Likes
7 Likes
Different song, same title:
7 Likes
9 Likes
10 Likes
All these songs. Ooooohhhh…
8 Likes
9 Likes
The facts are:
Jesus was allegedly a man who was a major thorn in the side of the Roman empire.
Jesus allegedly was a man who performed supernatural feats in front of thousands of people.
Jesus was a man who’s alleged crucifixion caused an earthquake accompanied by darkness and the rising up out of the grave of dead saints, who walked into a holy city, where “everyone” saw them.
Yet no historian who lived during the time of Jesus wrote anything about him. The father of Josephus was a man who lived during the time of Jesus and he wrote nothing about Jesus.
There is nothing in the Roman record or African record that supports the existence of Jesus.
Jesus was allegedly Jewish, yet the religion of Judaism does not believe he was a divine figure, the messiah–or the Son of God.
There are extensive writings and historical accounts by Josephus, enough to place in a select section of a library-- yet all Josephus wrote about Jesus, was two short accounts based on hearsay, gossip and scuttlebutt. The lack of extensive writings by Josephus on Jesus is a red flag–signalling that the ridiculous short accounts by Josephus are an insult to reason.
Zealot Christian believers, historians and anthropologists, faced with no credible anthropological evidence of the existence of Jesus–have always attempted to prove the existence of jesus by fabricating evidence to prove the existence of Jesus.
Jesus’ s myth is associated with that of a solar god. A percentage of the myth of Jesus is stolen from the sun, specifically the perceived movement of the Sun from earth during the fall (autumnal) equinox, winter solstice, spring (vernal) equinox and summer solstice. See original post in this forum.
A significant portion of the central and defining myth of Jesus is stolen from the varied and numerous African-Kemetic/Anu myths of Osiris, Horus, Isis, and a four part/scene vignette about the birth of a divine child called “The Annunciation, Conception, Birth and Adoration”.
Annunciation
The first scene on the left hand shows the God Taht (Thoth) [the New Testament Gabriel] the Lunar Mercury, the Annunciator of the Gods, in the act of hailing the Virgin Queen, Mut-em-ua, [Mary] and announcing to her that she is to give birth to the coming Son (Amenhotep III in the character of Horus, the divine child [prototype for the later Jesus].
In this set of engravings we have the Annunciation, the Conception, the Birth, and the Adoration as described in the first and second chapter of Luke’s Gospel. These scenes, which were mythical in Egypt, have been copied or reproduced as historical in the Canonical Gospels…
Immaculate Conception
In the next scene the god Kneph (the Egyptian Holy Ghost) and the goddess Hathor hold crosses, the Egyptian Ankh as a sign of life,originally to the head and nostrils of Isis and mystically impregnate her. Of course this myth is retold later in the account of Queen Mut-em-ua, the future mother of Amenhept III. Kneph (“the Egyptian Holy Spirit”) descends and assisted by Hathor, impregnates the virgin [the New Testament Mary] by holding the “ankh”,symbol of life, to her head, mouth, nostrils. Notice if you will that her belly is now swollen and enlarged with the life from God. In this scene the virgin is pictured as becoming pregnant (conceiving) through the Spirit…
The Birth Of The Child God
In the next scene on the far right we see the mother is seated on the midwife’s stool, and the child is supported and lifted up by the hands of one of the nurses. Originally, the mother, Isis, sits on a midwife’s stool, and the newly born infant, Horus, is held by attendants. With the development of the mythos we find that next the mother, Queen Mut-em-ua, the future mother of Amenhept III, the Biblical Solomon, is seated on the mid-wife’s stool, and the newborn child is supported in the hands of one of the nurses. Later this same story is told only the names of the virgin mother has been altered [Mary] as well as the name of the child god [Jesus instead of Horus].
Adoration
The fourth scene is that of the Adoration. Here the child is enthroned and adored by Amun, the hidden Holy Spirit behind all creation, and three men behind him (Amun) who offer and gifts with the right hand (open facing up) and eternal life with the left hands (holding again Ankhs/crosses). So we find the pattern for the later 3 gifts and 3 wise men that are depicted first thousands of years earlier on stone wall in the Temple of Luxor. These 3 figures are kneeling and offering gifts with the right hand and life (ankh cross) with the left hand…
In the temple of Amun at the site of Luxor in Egypt appears a series of scenes depicting the divine birth of the king/pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty (c. 1570-1293 BCE), Amenhotep/Amenhotpe or Amenophis III, who reigned during the 14th century BCE (c. 1390-c. 1352 BCE). The Luxor nativity imagery represents a significant artifact demonstrating important pre-Christian religious motifs evidently incorporated into Christianity.
The Origin of the transcendental themes of Christianity reach far into Ancient Egyptian antiquity. In the New Testament Book of Matthew 1:20-23, the story of the Annunciation, Conception, Birth, and Adoration of the child, Jesus, is presented. It tells how the “angel of the Lord” appeared to Joseph, informing him that his wife Mary is pregnant by the Holy Spirit of God. We are taught to believe this about a supposed historical person from our very childhoods and this is read and repeated in millions of homes in typical readings at Christmas where we read also the Lukan account of the birth of baby Jesus. But all of this is not new at all; in fact the “same story” identically predates the supposed Jesus of the first century by thousands and thousands of years. Little did we know that the supposed unique and Divine Revelation about baby Jesus lies carved on thousand year old walls of stone in the Holy of Holies of the Temple of Luxor that can be dated as far back as 5,5000 years B.C.E. or earlier…
Time to turn the lights down low…
9 Likes
9 Likes
Different people allege different things. Historians allege something akin to the former with a number of qualifications. They make no allegations about the second - that’s left the theologians. I make no claims on behalf of theologians, only historians. While you don’t understand this, the standard historical account that does take for granted some figure named Jesus but is still completely devastating to the theological account. The claims cranks make about the non-existence of Jesus are both uninformed and pointless.
2 Likes
11 Likes
8 Likes
7 Likes
or the original
7 Likes
7 Likes
9 Likes
