Pft. They kept wanting me to take that and more and more of it. I finally got off it. It just made me a zombie and I dont think it kept the pain in check at all. If it works for you, then right on. I wish it did for me.
Kitty was on it and he seemed to have that zombie-like effect. However, I imagine that dosage could be adjusted if we had decided to continue with treatment.
Thank you for the recommendation, I will read it. But you might want to read some of the comments on Amazon about that book - for example:
or
or
Iâve noticed that whenever well-moneyed interests talk about how prescription painkillers âsystematically destroyed an entire generation of Americansâ more than half of the âdestructionâ they are talking about was caused not by the drugs, or the patients, but by the government and by legalized bribery of physicians.
I was actually responding to a comment by @Clifton âbut painkiller addiction just is not a problem that happy people tend to haveâ; I wasnât implying anything at all about the treatment of unhappiness.
Not to mention that as one ages (he was 57, right?), the body chemistry changes in ways we donât fully understand. Could be what he (and/or his doctors) thought was a âsafeâ dose was getting to be on the edge of unsafe. At that point, anything could have pushed it into the danger zone; stress, exhaustion, and so on.
Sad! But I really hope we donât start restricting these drugs even further.
Letâs not forget that âPain is good for the soul.â (Other peopleâs souls, that is.)
Tell you what â show me my soul and you can beat it up, waterboard it, whatever. But give me the painkillers.
This is just an enraging topic and I do not look forward to another deluge of âEPIDEMICâ (yet another annoying misuse of the word) screaming and propaganda from the usual places.
Destroying peoplesâ livers for the crime of wanting to use natureâs best painkiller should be treated like a war crime.
Drug warriors will never give two shits about your pain. Youâre considered acceptable collateral damage, if youâre even thought of at all. Far more important that someone somewhere find it to be slightly more difficult to get high.
Yup, thatâs it. This is one of those situations where the words used by an average person have specific meanings in context.
Just this morning I heard on the news that this â exactly this â is happening with greater and greater frequency. Really sorry you have to go through this ultimately because others are irresponsible. Iâm lucky enough that chronic pain is not part of my life (not yet at least) but I feel for you there.
Itâs been an interesting shift over the last 10-15 years. When I worked at my first big job out of college with really amazingly comprehensive health benefits, the doctor my HMO chose for me would give me meds for anything like candy. She gave me packs of Ambien, clonazepam, and Zoloft âjust to have on handâ when I mentioned that I occasionally had mild bouts of insomnia during particularly stressful periods of work. The family doctor I have now refuses to give me any sleep or pain medications at all, saying âthe downside isnât worth it.â
Percocet contains acetaminophen. So do most cold and flu tablets, so if he was suffering from the flu, as claimed, he may have been doubling up on acetaminophen and risking acetaminophen toxicity.
Ugh. How do we stop this madness in the US? Single payer is way off in the distance.
You should save them. New guidelines are going to make them much harder to prescribe. My wife is a doc and has been getting new guidance on the subject, She used to say that there is no reason for a person in this country, in this age, to have to endure severe pain. That philosophy is changing, as a reaction to some people abusing painkillers. I had a period where I was in severe pain, and had to take some reasonably heavy painkillers. I cannot imagine having to go through that experience without the meds. But the priority in this country is fighting illegal drug use. If that means that a bunch of people have to endure excruciating chronic pain, that is apparently a small price to pay. I guess they will feel differently when Grandma hangs herself because she canât take the agony for one more minute.
I do, but wish I had more; When I have a medical or dental issues there is usually a couple of days between when pain starts getting bad and when I can see the doctor or dentist. I also cut the dose way down, because Iâve decided that a little pain and a clear head is better than no pain and unwanted euphoria.
Never take more than the minimum to make the pain survivable. First, because one quickly needs more to achieve the same effect. Secondly, it is a zero-sum issue. If you take more than necessary to dull the pain, that euphoria will always be followed by an equivalent low. The good news is that even after developing a little tolerance, a couple of weeks without taking any can reset you back to zero.
I had a serious back injury that was finally solved with surgery. But for a while, the pain would show up unpredictably. Often it would hit at night, and it would take about an hour for the pills to kick in. during that hour, the pain level would increase steadily. I often ended up walking barefoot and rubbing or clapping my hands to try to divert some of the pain with other sensory input. Anyway, I spent about a year living with sudden unpredictable onsets of horrific pain. I always had to keep pills with me. All that is long behind me. But When my wife talks about having to give some of her serious pain patents three days of pills, or just giving them OTC painkillers, I find it very concerning. I do not believe that I could have endured what I went through without the chemical help that I had available to me. I understand the concern with misuse and addiction, but I am much more concerned with what will happen if I, or a family member, ever has to deal with that level of pain in the future.
Iâm clearly some mutant who gets no euphoria from opioids. They only kinda work for me sometimes, but only if I see trails and immediately go to bed.
Iâm also witnessing the crack-down in the US from a second hand view. My sonâs grandma lives in chronic pain, but has had her opioid prescriptions nearly cut off in the last couple years. I fear sheâll give in to heroin dealers sooner than later.
Actually, no. Compared to most analgesics, the therapeutic index of the opiates is remarkably high.
Theyâre much safer than barbiturates, paracetamol or aspirin, for example. And, whereas a lethal paracetamol overdose involves a lengthy period of extreme agony, an opiate overdose is subjectively experienced as a heavily-stoned nap that never ends.
This relative safety does contribute to the addiction risk, and the tendency for them to be tightly regulated. Paracetamol, for example, is freely available not because itâs safe, but because it is too dangerous for recreational use.
Addiction is nearly always a symptom as much as it is a disease. Iâve known quite a few heroin addicts in my time, and pretty much all of them were rape and abuse survivors. The exceptions tended to be mentally ill or on the autism spectrum.
That doesnât exactly invalidate the point I was making about finding more effective, less addictive and safer analgesics. You kind of make my point because these drugs are all very, very old. Where are the more modern, safer alternatives?
There arenât any. We have a handful of synthetic opioids that match or exceed the naturally-derived opiates in effectiveness (e.g. Fentanyl), but those arenât safer, just stronger.
That is rather my point; drug development is astonishingly difficult, and naturally-occuring opiates are already exceptionally good at what they do. They really are amongst the most effective and least dangerous of the naturally-occuring pharmacopeia.
Cannabis, as useful and enjoyable as it may be, just isnât in the running in the serious analgesic game. A spliff may help you to be a bit less irritated when your arthritis is playing up, but it ainât gonna do shit when youâre dealing with the sorts of pain involved with, for example, recovering from abdominal surgery. Serious pain requires serious drugs, and risk scales with efficacy.
She gave me packs of Ambien, clonazepam, and Zoloft âjust to have on handâ when I mentioned that I occasionally had mild bouts of insomnia during particularly stressful periods of work.
Thatâs fucking messed up. I donât know about Ambien and clonazepam, but Iâm quite familiar with Zoloft (aka sertraline) which Iâve been prescribed for chronic depression and, later, for my social anxiety disorder (the core cause of my depression, as it turned out - two birds with one stone, as a result). And one thing is for certain, itâs that you donât take this molecule casually. Not that it has severe side effects, not in most cases anyway, but it has plenty of them, some being at least annoying (in my case, random yawning, mild tremors, and anorgasmia), and more importantly the benefits of taking it can only come in the long run. So basically taking it casually only gets you the side effects without any of the benefits. Talk about an awful deal.
Conversely, once my anxiety issues were diagnosed, Iâve been prescribed alprazolam (better known as xanax - an anxiolytic) for my anxieties as a transitional treatment, along with sertraline, in order to wait for the latterâs benefits to appear, and in order to manage peaks of anxiety.
All those, by the way, have been prescribed by a psychiatrist. General practitioners can theoretically prescribe those in France, and maybe some do, but itâs my understanding that most of them abstain, leaving it to the specialists. They limit themselves to renewing existing prescriptions, and to keeping an eye on side-effects, especially non-obvious ones (sertraline, for example, can cause a deficit in sodium).