Except that the government as a whole doesn’t care about accessibility [the public transit system here has little signs saying that they are accessible, but they still aren’t accessible for some of us with some sensory issues, the Obomneycare website has a page about accessibility with a pain number to call about accessibility problems, but without any other way to contact them about accessibility problems such as their insistance on using pain calls to resolve those problems that can be resolved [which leaves aside those that can’t, such as the hostage situation with Medicaid non-expansion, and the identification confirmation bull.]] so why would the courts care about the ada and the needs of disabled customers?
To me, “seventeen six” implies 2 separate numbers, and 23 and 102 seem as likely as anything else if it is 1 number.
Hey! There really is a Black Stump, not Bordeuax but Durif Shiraz and it’s my favourite >$50 wine.
It’s a… corker. well actually it’s got a screw top but don’t let that put you off.
Hmm, only seems to be available through laithwaites:
1 Like
i understand that out in the real world ADA laws have mixed degrees of implementation of compliance, but in a court situation with a judge ruling on the case it is a quite different situation. Even if you take the ADA laws out of the picture, there are still consumer protection laws, and contract laws, both in the patrons favor.
That’s the lowbrow cousin of Champipple.
17/6= 210 pennies, or seven eights of a pound.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
