Strategic butt-coverings in video-games

“All I’m saying is, there’s a market for Zyklon B, and its our fiduciary duty to our shareholders to maximize their value.”

10 Likes

All these comments. And for what? Defending pixel butts?

8 Likes

Is bringing up the Therac-25 programming error cherry picking data, or is it acknowledging that an outlier occurrence is still significant and gives us insight into industry practices, and what we should try to avoid?

This is older than Tomb Raider, and still being taught.

4 Likes

If you want a conversation to end YOU have to stop participating in it.

Or we could make fun of you until you run home with your tail between your legs.

And then follow you and tie cans to your tail.

And release goats to chase the cans.

Goats with fricken laser beams on their heads.

8 Likes

“The Therac-26 killed even less people, so no need to go on and on about the 25 anymore, unless you’ve got some sort of anti-programmer access to grind.”


“access” := “axe”

2 Likes

“You get that the whole reason she was in a flimsy robe when the plumber came was because the thermostat was broken and the house was hot, right? Plot!”

8 Likes

ebin banter m8.

Look up Godwins law

WIKIPEDIA:
Godwin’s law (or Godwin’s rule of Nazi analogies) is an Internet adage asserting that "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

Jargon File:
[Usenet] “As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.” There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress. Godwin’s Law thus practically guarantees the existence of an upper bound on thread length in those groups. However there is also a widely- recognized codicil that any intentional triggering of Godwin’s Law in order to invoke its thread-ending effects will be unsuccessful. Godwin himself has discussed the subject. See also Formosa’s Law.

2 Likes

I haven’t been paying attention, but thanks, excepting that I don’t Steam or console I only PC/Mac games and don’t play movie games at all. For instance the last game I played today was Banished, which I keep coming back to, and I check in on EVE occasionally, but the last time I had the kind of time to game required of most play-through games… I can’t even remember, I played Oblivion but never Skyrim, So it was some time ago. Gaming for me is like TV nowadays, 22 minutes or less.

So this is up for grabs, eh?

No, I was making the tremendous crazy logical leap from “things are slowly getting better” to “things are not getting worse.”

With that I had better withdraw from this conversation before I start namecalling.

1 Like

This is as bad as the Godwin’s law incident earlier. Are people dying because of pixel butts?

Never mind that despite the “near impossibility” of seeing batman’s butt claimed in the very text of the bb entry, you can get plenty of batt-butt views writhin a minute of powering up Arkham Knight. But you know, impossible because … reasons? Somehow it doesn’t matter if the examples used in the video are not just cherry picked and distorted to support a particular narrative but even flat-out wrong, because the cause is so noble and just?

Maybe I have too much of a logical programmer brain to let that go, but it bothers me, and has since the beginning. And it keeps happening in these videos.

Anyways. If you want to see an amazing, powerfully feminist take on Tomb Raider, one that has been near universally acclaimed by both feminists and plain old gamers like me, and is one of the most striking examples of videogames getting it right, which correct me if I am wrong but is the entire freaking point of these videos in the first place, just take me up on my offer for a free Steam copy of Rise of the Tomb Raider.

I do feel these discussions would be a hell of a lot better if the people involved had actually played any of the games being discussed. Hence my offer.

1 Like

Are the batt-butt views automatic, or do you have to work for them?

9 Likes

The creature stirred in his sickly broiling vapour, and at that very moment the words, “Are the batt-butt views automatic, or do you have to work for them?” drifted across the conference table.

9 Likes

Silicon chips.

1 Like

Excuse me, do you know if these batt-butt views are locally sourced and fairly traded?

5 Likes

What you don’t have, in this entire thread, apparently, is an opportunity to learn something.

13 Likes

I’ma just leave some of this here




…and repeat the mantra that it’s not about being good enough to not get criticized, it’s about continually improving, every day, every game, every release, forever.

5 Likes

Yeah but that’s just Rule 34 at this point. Anything, no matter how reasonably presented, can be turned into porn.

I don’t know how you ever become “good enough” to be immune to Rule 34.

So to be clear your argument is that there is no difference between Tomb Raider (2013) and, say, Tetris, when it comes to objectifying women’s bodies, because both have been turned into fap fuel? These two are equivalent in their level of objectifying women’s bodies?

1 Like