Continuing the discussion from I just got caught in the middle of a stupid and annoying reality TV show:
7 Likes
Iâm sorry about derailing like that. I wish I were able to move my stuff from your thread over here.
3 Likes
Itâs not that big a deal. Donât worry about it.
2 Likes
Iâve been trying to keep in mind that I can split off a topic if I canât help but derail.
2 Likes
PROTIP: Never respond to anything @alistairmichaelkinne writes.
But anyway, itâs a perfectly reasonable thing to talk about.
4 Likes
ABCâs What Would You Do? Features Angry Atheist Yelling at Praying Family in a Restaurant
If you havenât seen ABCâs show What Would You Do? â and you wonât want to after this â the premise is pretty self-explanatory. As the showâs website states, it âestablishes everyday scenarios and then captures peopleâs reactions.â So you might see a segment in which an actor clearly steals an item from a store⌠and the cameras zoom in on the other customers to see how they react: Do they tell someone or do they ignore it? You get the idea.
On Friday night, the show started out just fine. A military vet went to purchase diapers for his baby, but the cashier told him his credit card was declined. Will anyone help the poor soldier?! (Spoiler: They will! Yay America!)
But the next segment took a strange turn.
...
2 Likes
Good olâ Hemant Mehta. You can always rely on the guy to be less shouty and sweary than I can only barely prevent myself from being in the best case scenario.
1 Like
From that page:
23: An atheist angrily becomes vocal when a religious family next to him starts praying at a restaurant. (This scenario resulted in controversy as it negatively portrayed atheists or other nonbelievers.)
This is perhaps the least realistic scenario they could have come up with. Most atheists are acutely aware that the first amendment means that they donât have to worry about religious people throwing rocks at them till theyâre dead. So most of us atheists just politely ignore religious people saying grace and stuff like that. Itâs not like theyâre actually doing something harmful, like refusing to fill birth control prescriptions, or picketing soldierâs funerals. Theyâre just playing make believe for a few minutes with their families. Theyâre not even proselytizing.
Blows my mind that anyone would think this scenario is plausible. I challenge anyone to show evidence that that kind of beratement ever happens.
Itâs not that is specifically casts non-believers in a negative light. Itâs that this basically never happens, because reasonable people donât act that way. Sane people donât act that way. And itâs pretty much a complete straw man scenario.
11 Likes
Religious folks sure donât get the non-theist thing.
We would like you to stop being religious. We have not been commanded to stop you by the atheist god.
Athie-or! God of the athiests commands you not to believe in him!
8 Likes
We would like you to stop being religious.
I wouldnât go that far myself. Iâd just like people to put their money where their mouth is when it comes to personal philosophy.
7 Likes
Hmmm. Yeah. Itâs just that if you âgo to the endâ with that perfectly reasonable request, you get atheism.
You can also get all sorts of really weird stuff like simulation theory or all-powerful, vacuum-state creating aliens and whatnot.
Just not theism.
I think even the âgodsâ in such cases would be atheists.
2 Likes
Ahp! No, youâre right!
I should have said,
stop being Theists.
Organised atheistic religious practice and community is not neccessarily a bad thing. It often is. Just not always.
2 Likes
Athiesm is yet another belief system. âŚheading for religious status (the tax savings! ) much as scientism is now.
Not really. I think youâre confusing it with humanism, and other philosophies often associated with atheism. Atheism is as much a belief system as OFF is a channel on your TV.
Now, thereâs humanism, and valuing science, and those are philosophies that shape oneâs worldview, and are useful for figuring out ethics and treatment of others, and standards of evidence etc. All atheism says is that one hasnât been adequately convinced there is a god. Just because itâs hard to convince me of bullshit, doesnât mean my disbelief is dogmatic or religious in anyway. It just means youâre going to have to play by the rules of logic and evidence in order to convince me of something that is utterly false as far as Iâve seen.
9 Likes
Well, logically there is no evidence. But logically, the only logical position is wait until more information is availableâŚwhich is agnosticism.
There is lot more going on here than that which deductive logic can draw out.
Well, logically there is no evidence that Harry Potter and Voldemort and the Lucky Charms Leprechaun exist. But logically, the only logical position is wait until more information is available. Which is A-Rowling-ism.
No. I donât think so.
I donât know a god exists, because usually the claim of existence is formulated in an untestable way, which means it canât be known. Technically Iâm both an atheist and an agnostic. I canât claim to have any definitive proof no god exists. But as long as thereâs no evidence for a god, going make decisions and live my life as if there werenât one, which is no different than if nobody ever told me that I should believe in a god in the first place.
What youâre trying to do is use Pascalâs Wager to try and conflate atheism with agnosticism as if they were mutually exclusive. Unfortunately for you theyâre in fact quite orthogonal. Atheism deals in beliefs. Agnosticism deals in knowledge claims.
8 Likes
In debate, jumping to a conclusion is a foul.
Iâm waiting for information, as logically if I act as if even a mild vengeful god exists I should behave accordinglyâŚ
What a fearful and terrified way to live. Especially considering the hundreds of alleged jealous and wrathful gods for which there is no evidence. How can you tell which ones should treat as if they exist? I mean, as long as people are making claims, Iâd like to see some tests worked out, since thatâs how we determine the validity of hypotheses normally.
4 Likes
