☭ Sup Marxists? ☭


#1769

If you want perpetual hairstyle, you need a Trotsky cut.


#1770


#1771

#1772

I love how the top of the article goes into the typically Floridian sleaziness of how the fortune was acquired in the first place.


#1773


#1774

Please do feel free (as in beer speech) to participate in this topic I made about where the left’s media is hiding, and strategies for its future:


#1776

#tribal


#1777


#1778

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/1112540/the-william-morris-colouring-book/

Sadly, it doesn’t have a picture of the Houses of Parliament after they have been turned into a dung market.


#1779

https://www.quora.com/Is-climate-change-going-to-push-the-working-class-to-seize-the-means-of-production


#1784

I know this is supposed to be the Marxist page, but don’t you wonder what the other side are up to?


#1785

More Jacob Applebaum fallout


#1786

Ever since the alt-right started prattling on about “sovereignty”, I’ve been mildly obsessed with figuring out just what the hell they mean and then deconstructing it.
Another blow struck against this illusion.


#1787

#1788

Holy shit! I thought Jack Chick died.


#1789


#1790

I have been scrolling through their tweet discussion, and I can’t find any explanation of what bothers people about this. I am kind of indifferent to it. People posting a few panels seem to feel that is adequate context to explain whatever it is “supposed to be”. Maybe I am failing to jump to some obvious conclusion here.


#1791

It feels like it is what Jack Chick would have written about SJWs.


#1792

But what I see is merely a depiction. The difference with Jack Chick is that he would have offered some judgemental interpretation of what the depiction means through the lens of his ideology. Instead all I get is lots of hints that people find the depiction unflattering, but I am supposed to just guess why. But I don’t have enough context to form an opinion.


#1794

“But what do you mean? Why won’t someone answer me!”