The Georgetown article has the relevant laws in the footnotes, not the body text. They are general rulemaking processes that weren’t observed USC 553 B is one of the sections. In this case it is illegal in the sense that they didn’t obey the proper legal process to make a substantive procedural change rather than illegal in the sense of the equipment being disallowed.
that is helpful!
Thanks for clarifying!
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.