I switched for the same reasons and use ublock origin and privacy badger.
2 Likes
Unless they can work inside the YouTube app Iām not sure thatāll work
A shiny, gold-pressed latinum like for you then, sir. Iām not surprised you do though.
I have a whitelist, honestā¦ well, it consists of just duckduckgo at the moment (unobtrusive sponsored links) but iām being ethical? Yes? Helloā¦
Reality says it works in browsers. If youāre only talking about a phone app, good luck with that.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/youtube-all-html5/
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/youtube-enhancer-plus/
Holy crap! Thank you for that link! My life has changed forever for the better for only 3$ a month.
Replacing ads with cat photos makes life worth living again.
6 Likes
I suppose they didnāt explicitly suggest that consuming ads is a moral obligation, but I do think a positive post promoting the use of the āethical ad blockerā is a sort of implicit endorsement.
Iām troubled that they are bothering to give voice to this idea at all. Itās not a legitimate ethical issue, and should not be portrayed as such.
1 Like
Ethical schmetical. It was the last drop for me to get me to install Ghostery.
Reminds me of, two decades ago, using the Internet Junkbuster proxy, and then heavily modifying it to allow even tricks like replacing ads with gray images to not break page layout and inserting javascript files into pages, emulating whatās now Greasemonkey. Codenamed the version āInternet Enforcerā.
5 Likes
āMy ethics can beat up your ethics.ā
Thatās kind of a nice startā¦ but since Google is Google they refuse to actually solve the problem.
āFewer adsā is still plenty of malware. It of course just encourages people to use Google adsense. And as far as I can tell it doesnāt work if youāre running an ad blocker for self defense, because if youāre not loading the ads you donāt get a chance to bid on them.
I need something thatāll let me see zero ads and still give that money to the sites I visit. But Google has no interest in encouraging that.
Ad blocking is the easiest way to keep old people out of trouble on the internet.
Ad Away for rooted android phones works well, even on many in-app ads. I canāt believe the number of ads they try to load on my limited data plan.
2 Likes
Remotely hosted in-app ads on smartphones are the truly unethical thing here. Fuckem, if they want to send me data without my asking for it, they can pay for that themselves while I still block it.
In fact, Iāve half a mind to start sending threatening-looking legal documents to Scorecard research and quantserve demanding they pay for the data theyāve wasted on all my devices. Itās only half a mind, since Iāve blocked them for years, and now am on unlimited data. But most people are capped.
5 Likes
Yeah, a whole case of emā¦
1 Like
āBecause of the ad skipsā¦ Itās theft. Your contract with the network when you get the show is youāre going to watch the spots. Otherwise you couldnāt get the show on an ad-supported basis. Any time you skip a commercial or watch the button youāre actually stealing the programmingā¦ I guess thereās a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom.ā
So spake Jamie Kellner of Fox and WB, back in 2002. Theft, you see. Thatās what it is. Theft.
3 Likes
Uh, how does he account for cable? Ostensibly, it was sold under the banner of ad-free programming once upon a timeā¦ So now itās necessary for networks to demand money from me, and force me to watch their shitty, loud, repetitive, irritating, often borderline-fraudulent commercials?
What would he want next? Access to a usb port on me so they can pipe hot steaming shit directly into my amygdala?
1 Like
Maybe not consciously. Advertising can be a lot subtler than āHEY CLICK HERE! BUY THIS THING RIGHT NOW!ā
1 Like
Like boing boing linking to things on Amazon that theyāre discussing. Iām sure the site gets a referral for it if a purchase happens
1 Like
Itās been explained to me that clicking on one of those links, whether or not you buy the product at that time, means anything you buy from that site for a certain amount of time (at least a few days, if I recall correctly) is credited to BB. To me, thatās too far.
And letās not forget that the recording industry didnāt even survive to complain about electronic downloads because it was killed off by cassette tapes.
6 Likes
That makes sense though, i generally add things to my cart or wishlist so i can mull on it. I almost never end up buying any of it but the timeframe seems about right.
Iām a bit torn on the practice though. Why shouldnāt BB get a referral on purchases from products they discuss? I donāt have a problem with it if BB gives me a heads up to something cool that i might like. But the part that i find shady is the fact that this referral process is not made transparent to us readers.
Totally agree with you there. But if I go back to Amazon two days later and buy something completely different, having nothing to do with anything Iāve read on BB? No, thatās not ethical and itās creepy as hell.
2 Likes
