Scutwork? really? What percentage of the population know that Shitwork is a version of that?
Wasnât it at the Times that J. Anthony Lukas coined the âbarnyard epithetâ euphemism? At least that had the virtue of terseness.
They once interviewed one of the Mythbusters, who said something like âThis is the point in the show where we get to blow [stuff] up!â, and explained that he had actually used a different word instead of âstuffâ.
The New York Times does not give a single fuck.
Came for the âZero! Zero fucks given!â Left satisfied.
Meanwhile, this from The Guardianâs Media Monkey on Wednesday, about the Daily Telegraph:
However, the Telegraph canât quite bring itself to print the words âshaggingâ, opting for âs-------â instead and telling readers that it is âa vulgar term for sexual intercourseâ. âB----â doesnât make the cut either â it makes Monkey wonder how the paper manages to cover Wimbledon.
Fuck**g weird.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
