Bottom Feeder
14 Likes
“If you are digesting Russian misinformation and parroting Russian talking points, you are not aligned with longstanding bipartisan American values, which is to stand up for the sovereignty of countries like Ukraine, but others,” Psaki said at a press briefing.
“Their right to choose their own alliances, and also to stand against, very clearly, the efforts, or attempts or potential attempts by any country to invade and take territory of another country,” she continued. “That applies to Sen. Hawley, but it also applies to others who may be parroting the talking points of Russian propagandist leaders.”
13 Likes
10 Likes
13 Likes
“We’ll see” is a line directly copped from 45.
Man, I hope all her bad karma eats her before she can make the attempt…
16 Likes
Another thing directly copped from him is fund raising on complete bullshit.
12 Likes
we’ll see what the people think about something like that
12 Likes
i can already see where that is going. i can look into the future and see president greene signing an executive order outlawing all covid vaccines with cdc director berenson and the head of the nih rogan standing beside her ready to put it into effect.
12 Likes
11 Likes
This is the old Roman thing too. “Oh, I guess I could fulfill my lifelong ambition of being emperor, if the senate absolutely insists on it.” Except instead of asking the upper class, she’s asking a bunch of people who have been convinced that they share the upper class’s interests.
11 Likes
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/04/politics/michael-avenatti/index.html
The part where they’re discussion the jury, when they sent a note to the judge asking for help because one juror just “had a feeling” is kind of wild…
“Please help us move forward not going on any evidence, all emotions and does not understand this job of a jury,” the note added, with the word “please” underlined.
To which Avenatti responded:
Avenatti moved for a mistrial arguing that the jury is clearly deadlocked, and any further instruction or action would be coercive.
When the judge refused, here’s what hapened next…
Avenatti opposed some wording in the instruction telling the judge it could “appear to convince a potential hold-out juror for acquittal.” The judge noted Avenatti’s assumption that the jury was leaning to convict him and said they had no way of knowing the jury split.
11 Likes
Damn, Murphy Brown has changed!
17 Likes
15 Likes
11 Likes
Christ, what an asshole
6 Likes
I just drove through Sandy this afternoon. That is NOT what we want the rest of the state to be like.
7 Likes
It’s a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t credit Stan Pulliam for anything nice about it
6 Likes
Maybe if we made conservatives pay utilities and other bills only “in person” that might get them to back off…
8 Likes
