Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/12/13/the-rise-and-fall-of-peorias-cookie-monster.html
…
Is this a reboing? Or deja vu?
ETA:
For me it was jamais vu. Cool, there is a word for the opposite of déjà vu.
Using BoingBoing search for “Peoria’s” turned up only this story, and Cookie Monster turned up 9 stories including this one. Google listed the same story twice.
Seems like the store owner looses, and the artist was paid and got some publicity, and would likely get a commission to redo the work elsewhere. (I like it.) There still seems something off about the story.
Edits: to add sources and edit some text, and change formatting.
The artist could have just painted it and said he was paid by a mystery man. Takes all the blame off him, gets lots of publicity
Deja reboing?
Where’s the t-shirt?
I was just ahead of the curve.
First- Great name and icon/avatar. Sorry that you seem to be kidnapped and mind controlled a lot. My eldest has a lot to say about the subjugation of kaiju, and King Ghidorah in particular. Do three headed monster wear sweaters with 3 neck holes, or just one large one? Is a turtleneck(s) a proper gift for a three headed kaiju? So many questions today.
Second- I agree. That said there are all sorts of questions. What’s there a check written, or just cash. Was a ticket written for defacing or damaging someone else’s property? If not, why? (I am good with up this.). Did the arrest make up the “mystery man” ? Why Cookie Monster and Cyrillic characters? Was it a dig on the commercial property owner? Why the lack of commas? (See: Comma Abuse In Russian, none of the words spend in an “и” (Unicode small Cyrillic I ), so there should be commas, or perhaps because each word is it’s own independent clause or statement it should stand alone.- but I digress.) Why no translation text at the bottom of the art piece? Why am I spending so much time thinking about this post?
As you can see, so many questions.
I’ve got family in Peoria that know the indie art scene there pretty well. Their suspicion is that the artist made up the “benefactor” and is trying to be a midwest style Banksy.
That sounds vastly more plausible than “mystery man paid me to paint someone else’s building”. That’s the dumbest excuse for vandalism I’ve ever heard.
So, the impersonator knows the actual owner of the property and pays the artist in full and leaves without a trace? That’s an expensive practical joke (this artists charge must charge at least $2500, probably more). Something in this fact pattern is amiss.
No suspects yet, but authorities are seeking a person of interest:
So it turns out that mural didn’t end up playing in Peoria.
Judging by Conte’s over-the-top nasty reaction, I’d imagine there are numerous suspects in town for the patron behind that awesome mural.
I was okay with Banksy until I considered the possibility of Regional Banksys.
It does seem to smack of hyperbole, almost as if this same artist hired his aspiring writer friend to compose a lengthy explanation for his recently created mural, which appeared, ever so briefly, then disappeared when Sesame Street executives called up the landlord with a cease and desist letter! What a week in Peoria! Ok, maybe it didn’t happen exactly like that, but isn’t it great, everyone got some free PR in these crazy times.
Branch Banksys?
First National Banksy?
I guess it didn’t play in Peoria, as the saying goes.
It’s the letter of the day!
I’m hoping Comte hires someone to paint a giant Oscar the Grouch with “Замри, умри, воскресни” as the caption.