Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/02/27/the-us-department-of-justice-h.html
…
8 Likes
“Your appeal has failed, ex-citizen. Step in to the retort to be denatured.”
28 Likes
So this is bad? But my stock investments are up. The market is great. The corona virus is totally under control. The wall is stopping border crossings from turning the US into a hive of scum and villainy.
/s
38 Likes
Creating stateless unpersons by revoking their only valid citizenship is against international treaty, but what the hell!
52 Likes
Also Soviet Union.
Most forms of political activism can be labeled terrorism when arguing in bad faith. It will be a very useful tool to punish dissidents.
39 Likes
Does Il Douche care? He would probably consider that a bonus!
14 Likes
During the Harper years, I think they were looking at revoking the citizenship of born Canadians, where they also had some half-assed citizenship from their parent’s country, which they might not have ever set foot in.
14 Likes
You guys are slacking. Here in the Mother of Parliaments. we’ve already started stripping citizenship from natural-born citizens.
And no court case is required; it can be done on the say-so of a cabinet minister.
24 Likes
It’s not a unique case in UK:
13 Likes
Also of note:
In which he says diversity is un-American.
32 Likes
I thought that barring naturalization fraud - this was illegal.
18 Likes
Combine this latest move with Barr’s views on the primacy of the executive branch and on how an administration’s (or at least a Republican one’s) opponents should be regarded, and this is yet another in a series of disturbing developments.
24 Likes
And then there are the worst-case scenarios: who could trust that the government would limit these cases to terrorists and sex offenders, and who gets to define what constitutes terrorism or a sex offense?
This is a dangerous nativist agenda no matter what way you slice it
And this is how the Three Strikes Laws were “camel-nosed” in. First, they submit a “get tough” law, and anyone who objects gets: “Are you soft on criminals? Do you like high crime rates?”
Then, they made things like burglary (a non-violent crime) part of the ‘3 Strikes’, and, again, if you objected you got “Do you think burglary should not be punished?” But of course that led to people stealing a bike or a slice of pizza literally getting 15 years in prison, especially when zealous prosecutors start perniciously upgrading misdemeanors to felonies.
27 Likes
Why is our ‘Attorney General’ only giving speeches to religious groups? Talk about spitting in the face of the 1st Amendment.
34 Likes
Legal-schmegal.
19 Likes
Odds are that the “worst case scenarios” will soon be the standard scenarios.
17 Likes
30 Likes
If they include countries that no longer exist, could this be applied to people who are no longer living? Can we suggest which case should be investigated first?
24 Likes
Fuck Harper. He was/is an incompetent lying piece of garbage.
6 Likes
See Egypt, where just a critical tweet is an act of terrorism.
13 Likes
