Originally published at: Tour of a vinyl record-making factory | Boing Boing
…
Previously on Boing Boing:
I’m an engineer. I can appreciate the skill, talent, and commitment involved in mass-producing any complex object. All the people and equipment involved in this process are fascinating. But at the same time, as an engineer, I cannot abide inefficiency. So this whole endeavor, requiring such exacting precision, all to produce an object whose audio reproduction (if it isn’t ruined by a speck of dust or the needle itself) is still inferior to the digital alternatives, confounds me.
I appreciate the sound quality from both analog and digital sources (both in high resolution), but vinyl keeps a solid place in my heart for the many tangible things one can enjoy, including (but not limited to) the cover, handling the vinyl, the magic of needle + groove = wow, and having to care for your record and forgive its minor flaws. One has to take those things in total. There’s a sound quality in analog that defies description, which simultaneously defies the concept of ‘absolute purity’. Also, you don’t have to like it.
The only saving grace of vinyl for me is that it’s physical media that I own that won’t be changed by some company’s modified end user license agreement later. I can listen to crap, slowly-degrading audio for as long I want.
Also
there are 127 things that can go wrong, according to the video
This is because the music industry stores failure data in an 8-bit signed integer format. /s
That topic also had a reply with a video on Third Man Records.
Somehow, even Jack White managed to have less hype for analog media than, “your nervous system is designed to take in the sound.”
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.