Trump, Hitler, and equating things that are vaguely similar in some aspects

Yeah, you said that. Multiple times, I think.

When you’re posting weird racist stuff, people don’t really care about your intent. If you’d accepted the criticism and moved on, everybody would be talking about something else now.

Instead, you’re still repeating yourself after nuking your own account.

Is this a problem for you in other arenas? You just can’t let things go?

12 Likes

uh yeah excuse me,the nazis were a party in 1930s germany, it’s not 1930s germany IPSO FACTO trump is not a nazi.

wait, sorry i thought this was the nyt opinion section my bad!

1 Like
9 Likes

I see how it was not a good train of thought (more of a derailment), and how it would be viewed as outlandish or condescending.

I thought about that, and I’ll admit in that case I’d probably have picked football. :frowning_face:


The original topic was not meant as a “pissing contest” though, or a defense or appeasement of Trump. There’s a well researched distinction between nazism and fascism, and this difference is not made to defend, or prefer one or the other.

Several removed posts suggest this topic is quickly derailing from its original topic.