Here’s an article explaining the charges against Ms. Carone that presents the information without delving so deep into misogynist garbage:
Definitely a piece of work.
ETA: Also clearly not someone we should take seriously on issues of computer security considering she wasn’t even competent enough to hide her own IP address when committing her crimes. Bruce Schneier she ain’t.
If their past crimes are not really relevant to the case, it may just the attorney look like an asshole and the witness more sympathetic as a result to bring these things up. This is why witness impeachment is a risky tactic.
In this particular case she already did a great job ruining her credibility with her belligerence and attitude. An attorney pilling on with a “so let’s talk about your past” would have just looked like a bully.
Um…I’ve never heard of an associates degree being available from UM, a 4-year university. You could get an associates in something IT-ish at Washtenaw Community College, though. Did she think “pretty much the same town, what’s the diff”?
Whatever’s going on, she clearly has a very flexible relationship with the truth. Of course that makes her exactly the kind of witness you’d expect Giuliani and Team Biff to dig up.
I stepped into an ITT office once, at the end of my rope during the hiring freeze of 2008. It felt like a strong-arm army recruitment center who just wanted my school loan money.
Nothing wrong with associates degrees or CC! It’s a real money saver for a lot of families for kids to do their first 2 years at CC, then get the last 2 years and the bachelors degree from the much pricier 4-year institution. Since both WCC and UM are mere bus rides away from our house, I would take zero umbrage at Jr. Kidd going about post-secondary this way!
That said, there shouldn’t be a single HR person in the whole of metro Detroit who wouldn’t spot these lies.
Ok, but consider an alternate world in which Daniels was a teacher, or a lawyer, or a CEO. Do you still think that every mention of his infidelity and violations of campaign finance law would still lead with Daniels’ profession?
Relevant, sure. Necessary? Probably not. Like I said before she did a perfectly good job impeaching her credibility just by opening her mouth. I can’t imagine anybody on that panel taking her testimony seriously.