They gave you this critique during the actual movie? I wouldn’t want to go to a movie with them either. And by “with” I mean in the same theatre as them. Why won’t people just shut up and watch the show?
On suspension of disbelief, I can happily do it for the main premise, but the ongoing niggles of unnecessarily bad science wear me down. As do the relentless and implausible coincidences that lazy writers use to advance the plot in movies like this.
To a lesser extent, better avoid the Hoover Dam as well. It has seen its share of disaster movies too. But I was surprised to see cars driving over it in the preview for this one. Traffic has been banned on it for security and safety reasons since they built that bypass bridge a few years back. Maybe they re-open it to cars on special occasions, such as for earthquake swarms.
I know the Oatmeal is highly controversial here, what with Matt Inman being an incorrigible dickweed on certain topics, but I really do love his idea for movie theater layouts:
Yeah, okay, Ms. Seismologist. Some valid points there but you’ve got a lot to learn. For instance, everyone knows the #1 rule of earthquake safety is DO NOT fall into the chasm.
Back when ‘Twister’ came out, a bunch of friends and I got stoned and went to see it. It was AMAZING. I’ve chosen to never view it again to preserve the experience.
I was laughing so hard at the preview for this in the theater I was crying. You know how people in LA really act in a big quake? We stand there wondering if it’s gonna stop or … should we get under a table? I guess maybe we should? Oh, it stopped.
On the other hand, in that made-for-tv miniseries 10.5 that was on NBC about 10 years back, they set off a nuke in “Gilroy”‡ to try to stop the titular temblor.
‡ It had an awfully Pacific Northwest vibe (pine forest, overcast, large streams) for central California.