@IronEdithKidd, you are now officially on triple-secret probation!
Tool.//
Canāt tell if joke or serious. Someone help me out please - is this pro Bernie or against? Both?
I first saw it in connection with a story about Bernie having argued against a trade agreement with Panama, and there was some argument that Bernie would have had the foresight to avoid the Panama tax haven situation. So, Iāve seen it as pro-Bernie and serious.
Not super sure about how it relates to the Hillary / Walmart connection.
Here is an abc news report on her being on the Walmart board. https://youtu.be/yuZhwV24PmM
This relentless program of anti-Hillary, pro-Bernie propaganda is becoming annoying.
We get it, Cory.
You feel the Bern.
Letās just hope you donāt make America great again.
Trump drinks dolphin blood.
Iād feel better, for several reasons, if there were more videos of Bernie successfully stopping those mistakes.
Fuckall is about the size of it, but I suspect sheāll do even less. You know what? Fuck it. If the Dems donāt like it when independents run in their races, we shouldnāt run in their races. We should just split the vote and see how much they enjoy that cake that theyāre begging to have and eat.
Keep hope aliveā¦
As opposed to the opposite in every other venue?
They remain more compelling than Clinton helping to implement said mistakes.
Yeah, thatās what Iāve been thinking, that this is in relation to the Panama Papers.
But, in my mind it just makes Bernie look like he canāt get anything done - he warned us about Panama, but what has he done to stop/change it? Itās great that you can go home at the end of the day and say to yourself that youāve kept your morals, but if you donāt actually achieve anything, does it matter in the end? I know currently the result of āachieving somethingā in a perverse sick mess, but the whole point of congress is to work together to get something done.
Slightly off-topicā¦ The whole Panama Papers coverage is really starting to agitate me (get off my lawn, etc etc). Is it really news that rich people hide things offshore in places that cater to such things? The interesting stuff is how they are doing it to skirt tax/law enforcement, whereās THAT coverage.
Letās imagine you saw someone speak truth to power.
Now what if you could give power to truth?
Youād vote Bernie.
As for the panama papers, the fact is that people hearing a rumour that I donāt wash my penis is way different from me taking it out, jumping on the table and dipping it in their soup.
Leaks demonstrating that it isnāt just a few bad apples but a burgeoning disaster of unfunded services by tax avoidance is good pressure for addressing a problem.
I get that, but what naive fool would believe that āthe partyā (Democrat, Republican, Green, Libertarian, any party) would choose to not throw their support behind their own rank and file.
Seriously, how can this be news to anyone??
For gods sake, vote in the congressional elections, and even better vote in elections down the whole line, right down to city councilors. The only way to change the system is to push people up through it that will do something different. Changing the entire āpartyā by electing one figure head isnāt going to happen.
(Yes, Iāve been regurgitating this ramble since Obama was elected and people were upset that unicorns and rainbows didnāt appear overnight)
Damn you, now I have Robās penis on my mind. Sadly, I fully expect the scenario you describe to actually have been performed by him, bless his soul.
But, the president doesnāt really have that much power. He would have to work with congress to get things done, and to me it feels like heād be stonewalled by both parties. Something like Obama vs. Republicans, but on an even bigger scale, and Obama didnāt get along with the Democrats all the time either.
I guess the short version is, yes, we can give power to the truth, but the truth wouldnāt have any power to enact the truth.
Surprise, there are laws governing what the (potential - not sure if she quit before or after the election) first lady can do, and Iām going to guess that sitting on corporate boards is not one of them.
Yeah, Iām sure it will be completely different for a President Clintonā¦
Trump is actually a colony of malevolent nanites that have assumed nominally human form.
it explains so much