How much distribution would you really get from 87,500? (25K * 3.5). Don’t get me wrong, I’d still roll the dice and count 'em up!
4 Likes
Would the same shear forces work on smaller cubes? Salt crystals, maybe?
3 Likes
The video was far less satisfying than I had hoped.
5 Likes
Dare we ask?
2 Likes
You can give it a try virtually-
1 Like
Publish a paper on methodologies for removing semifossilized stool from aging patients in your Emergency Dept.
3 Likes
Never got it below 86900 nor above 88100 in about 50 rolls.
1 Like
Looks like my nephew’s wedding, except with horses, and on a city street.
1 Like
The few times I’ve played games with lots and lots of dice, the counting up results turned into a real chore. I’d be amazed if someone isn’t already selling a gaming pad that will automatically sum up the results of hand thrown dice.
1 Like
Hey. That’s the roll of the dice.
5 Likes
Given that a ‘roll’ involves 25,0000 dice and 100,000 agitations; I’m guessing that it’s either Probability Paralysis 2nd edition or Stochastic Slurry Alpha 1.
2 Likes
God is the Agitator!
2 Likes
Buddy, you just did.
-1 Attentiveness.
+1 Word Usage.
No modifier next round.
3 Likes
So, all I need to do is spin my apartment?
2 Likes
Scientists. Whatever. I can dump a bunch of dice in a cylinder almost as well as they can.
Scientists think they’re so big.
1 Like
Intelligent dice-ign…
3 Likes
That’s what she said …
Well, you can use this example next time your theist friend comes talking about how the complexity of arrangements in the Universe proves God.
Or you can repent and convert now.
I would be more impressed if the dice spelled out pi in base-10 numbers when they lined up, because I lived in a reality where purely by coincidence the first 25,000 digits of pi in base 10 were all between 1 and 6.
Although I suppose if I did exist in such a reality, it’d probably seem normal.
