Continuing the discussion from Four years of BBS :
@codinghorror suggested I fork this off. Specifically, my suggestion for getting more feedback from the moderators about posts getting deleted and the results of flagging. However, I think thatās putting the cart before the horse. We already have 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] (No notifications on deleted posts?) meta topics on āgetting more feedback from the mods;ā we donāt need a sixth, especially if thatās not the problem weāre trying to solve.
The line that started that whole discussion was:
Iāve explained my own reasons for not flagging in the parent topic:
So, in short, my reasons for not flagging are the trio of ālack of feedback,ā āunpredictabilityā and ācollateral damage.ā
But those arenāt necessarily the problem. The problem is that there is a general lack of flagging, not that there is a lack of @nimelennar flagging.
So, the first thing we need to do is determine why there isnāt more flagging. Is it for the same reasons I gave, or is it for other reasons? If itās the former, then we can start discussing ways of tweaking the Discourse moderation system in order to make it easier for the mods to give us feedback. If Iām the exception, not the rule, then, once we determine what the actual issue preventing flagging is, then we can start fixing it.
Iām going to make this post a wiki. Add your own reasons, and then Iāll make a poll out of it once we have a long-ish list.
#Reasons Boingers donāt flag:
- lack of feedback (added by nimelennar)
- unpredictability (added by nimelennar)
- collateral damage (added by nimelennar)
- already flagged into oblivion (added by JemmieDuffs, multiple concurrences)
- new members get flagged/punished more than regulars for same bad behavior (added by JemmieDuffs, multiple concurrences)
- benefit of the doubt (added by wisconsinplatt)
- skimming through/avoiding hot topics (added by wisconsinplatt/Purplecat)
- restricting flags to people who arenāt sticking around (added by Phrenological)
- live and let live (added by stinkinbadgers)
- donāt see anything that bad (added by stinkinbadgers, multiple concurrences)
- staying out of direct arguments (added by lamaranagram)
- doesnāt change the assholes (added by lamaranagram)
- canāt remember post history to put comment in context (added by lamaranagram)
- leaving the wrongness be as a memorial to wrongness (added by Snowlark)
- lack of reading comprehension is not a flaggable offense (added by stinkinbadgers, who hopes everyone realizes was mocking himself)
- difficulty in determining if something is genuinely flag-worthy vs. something I find personably objectionable. (added by @nothingfuture)
- the vast majority of everything posted doesnāt bother me enough to flag, and Iād always rather err on the side of letting things devolve into flamewars (well, not quite) rather than sit at a dreary tea-party of rigid ideological conformity (added by, of all people, @Donald_Petersen who doesnāt really want to watch the world burn)
- no action is ever taken (added by Israel_B)
- disagreement with the actions taken as a result of previous flags (added by FerrisWheeler/fiddlingfrog)
- snitches get stitches (added by SenorSchaffer)
- I just figure arguing is how some people have to come to an understanding (added by critter)
- donāt want to disrupt the wonderfully wandering nature of conversation here (added by critter)
- even some odious posts are actually teachable moments (added by AP)
- If I am not immediately compelled to flag it for gross abuses, Iāll usually just keep scrolling (added by AP)
- It gets threads shut down and victims banned for fighting back. (added by OtherMichael)