Please, AP, donât pretend you arenât half (if not more) of this conversation.
Now it feels more like elementary school. Just back-and-forth âI know you are but what am I?â
I take this to mean youâre aware that youâve added nothing, including what you said you came here to show.
Donât blame both sides for that, only one has gaslit, stated the opinions of others for them, and refused to provide evidence of claims!
Iâve thanked, admitted misunderstanding, and asked for clarification - and thatâs directly to Skeptic.
Different rules for the victim, thatâs what defines bullying. Thatâs what that is. Shameless semi-talented driving trollies.
Whatâs amusing me is that these exchanges are FAR more hostile than anything of mine that got flagged and deleted! Some people can argue comfortably, and some flag if they feel contradicted.
You fight like a dairy farmer.
Weâre well off any semblance of topic at this point anyway. Might as well do something more fun instead.
denial of context is a tyranny. Maybe in context you seemed more hostile.
Iâm not hostile to any person, but pretty hostile to disruptive behavior like misquotes of me and namecalling. I donât take it personally though, not hardly. Seriously, yes. Personally, no.
Funny when a user can quote other people incorrectly to make a point, but wonât quote himself to make a point, despite stating a desire to but the audience isnât worth it. Oh, wait, not funny⌠puerile.
Hell, even I agree with that.
Might as well do something more fun instead.
Right? This thread needed a dancing break a LONG time ago.
http://crazyhyena.com/imagebank/g/funny-man-dance-gif-crazy.gif
First you better stop waving it about like a feather duster.
I posted a link to the text of the relevant portions of the threads.
thatâs because youâve proven an incapacity to agree with me, seemingly out of principle.
Iâm sure itâs my ego in the way, along with all the other failings in this conversation weâre both part of but for which I am alone responsible.
I am so sorry for your humility problem!
great. I was speaking to someone else who refused to post a link.
But, to your point, Maybe in context you seemed more hostile?
that was a direct question. Do you care to share an opinion conversationally or change the subject autocratically?
Feels like Pre-K from this POV.
Please note, Iâve also been reasonable. That hasnât been reciprocated.
Also, this is one thread. And itâs a meta thread about why we donât flag.
Maybe we should more, but flagging doesnât fix a lack of humility.
Yet your response was directed at me. I do not understand what youâre getting at in the last question.
Your story is disingenuous through and through. You are literally complaining that you were not enough of a dick to deserve the punishment, but your deleted post singled out and threw shade at another poster and it got flagged. You still didnât prove your favoritism case through a closed thread and deleted post you are constantly trying to downplay your hostility.
Would I have deleted your post? I doubt I would. Were you being hostile? Without a doubt. You are now arguing degree which is entirely different.
[quote=âgellfex, post:234, topic:92209, full:trueâ]
Whatâs amusing me is that these exchanges are FAR more hostile than anything of mine that got flagged and deleted! Some people can argue comfortably, and some flag if they feel contradicted.
[/quote]Then flag it and let it be closed.
I see that you took this:
Funny when a user can quote other people incorrectly to make a point, but wonât quote himself to make a point, despite stating a desire to but the audience isnât worth it. Oh, wait, not funny⌠puerile.
to be about you alone.
I submit that I would have called you by name if I meant you or you alone.
That I said âusersâ might let you know that I wasnât speaking about you specifically.
Now, IN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT YOU LINKED, Maybe in context you seemed more hostile? And I mean more hostile than whatever hostility you were referring to here. Maybe?
Iâve asked three times now, care to respect the question? I mean, really, if i canât ask a question and have it respected then I am not in conversation, youâre in monologue with someone very controlling. Is that you, or could you deign to answer the question and share YOUR opinion on it?
Three times. Thatâs respectful, so return it or lose it.