That’s as off-base as your weird premise for this entire thread, that you feel criticism of Obama is disrespectful, a sentiment as undemocratic as any fascist firing squad.
Also, you totally didn’t read the article you posted, The BLM moms claimed they weren’t prompted or prodded for their endorsements, the next several paragraphs are devoted to describing the prompting and prodding by the Clinton campaign and Clinton herself as they specifically sought the endorsements.
It isn’t questioning the decision making or integrity of a person to read an article and repeat what is there. And in my post I specifically wrote that the average moms swept up in a charm offensive intended to garner their endorsements were blameless.
Your guarantee isn’t worth used toilet paper if it is anything like your ability to discuss or debate high matters. For god’s sake you didn’t even read the article, If you even skimmed it you did so without a critical mind present.
Sorry, I don’t want to confuse you. Critical thinking is not equivalent to being critical of someone or something (which is not by necessity negative btw). Critical thinking is objective analysis or evaluation of a subject or issue in order to form a judgement. I read the article, the glaring contradiction between the first quote in the 5th paragraph and the information in the 4 following paragraphs is evident.
Hey it was your non sequitur. If you didn’t want people to read it, don’t post it. Here’s a neat trick for you, if not for most people here, it’s a segue. We -were- talking about consistency in a post or two b4 your non sequitur,
That’s your candidate in support of her husbands justice reforms that severely ramped up the number of young black people being sent to jail, in such numbers that the prison system was over-whelmed, largely in part to some of the stupidest mandatory sentencing policies ever, particularly the 3 strikes portion, wherein a person could (and did) receive life sentences for shoplifting.
She helped build the problems in the US with regard to mass incarceration, racial profiling, mandatory sentencing, and it led to increased recidivism in the communities these problems broke, becoming the war on the people by the police we see today.
But you’re all for her, rah rah rah, yet you can’t legibly say why.
See, we were talking about their relative positions on civil liberties and their consistency over their careers in these matters. You practically told me post this, a video of your candidate referring to young black offenders, often the victims of a biased criminal justice system, as “super predators…that need to be brought to heel”
No, she hasn’t apologized yet. Her husband has said he regrets doing what he did, but so far Hillary is a-ok with calling people predators and suggesting we treat them like DOGS.