And in February, disgraced cancer researcher Anil Potti used copyright claims to censor Retraction Watch
You seem to be going beyond the evidence there. Potti hired a Repairer of Reputations... and then some grifter set up a bogus journal in order to claim that Retraction Watch entry was violating the journal's copyright (for which it plagiarised the RW entries). It could be purely a coincidence!
The Ars Technica article skirts outright accusation, but makes a clear inference ...
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.