Would it actually make that much of a difference for the NYT, though…
1 Like
Not sure why I am putting this here, since the AI connection is the least infuriating thing about it…
1 Like
4 Likes
Or just regular old pranksters
3 Likes
I guess giving it unfettered access to Fox News was a mistake.
3 Likes
https://mastodon.social/@kristenhg/110714469552688499
One of my former (and very long-term) freelance gigs, How Stuff Works, has replaced writers with ChatGPT-generated content and also laid off its excellent editorial staff.
It seems that going forward, when articles I wrote are updated by ChatGPT, my byline will still appear at the top of the article with a note at the bottom of the article saying that AI was used. So it will look as if I wrote the article using AI.
To be clear: I did not write articles using ChatGPT.
5 Likes
3 Likes
2 Likes
Another reason not to text while drunk.
1 Like
5 Likes
Gee I wonder why
3 Likes
Then again, that’s just what an AI would say.
5 Likes
Marketing stunt.
Nice touch: Heise asked Bing to “test” it.
4 Likes
3 Likes
Keep testing those guardrails 
2 Likes
I’ve always found companies with screening layers before you talk to a human to be complete wastes of time, even if you do eventually do see a human.
3 Likes
1 Like
10 Likes
