doctorow at August 17th, 2013 00:06 — #1
johnlongview at August 17th, 2013 00:23 — #2
...I think you mean Giger. Unless you're checking for radiation...
the_damned_fool at August 17th, 2013 00:45 — #3
Ich liebe die Giger "creep factor". My colleague above is right. Yes, I almost fell into the trap of defending "Geiger" when I meant "Hans Rudi".
carlosdanger at August 17th, 2013 00:59 — #4
bio-mechanical beauty that is both physically sensual and intellectually fascinating
I hate to be Wally the Word Worm, but things that are "sensual" are physical by their very nature. Also, something that is fascinating is always beheld with the intellect. Hence, "sensual and fascinating" would suffice (that was painless, wasn't it?)
Anyway, I've always been fascinated by Giger and have never sensed anything remotely akin to a "creep factor" in his transcendent artwork - Pierre Matter's work (on the other hand) seems quite creepy and on the level of some sort of pseudo-sexual animal fetishism...sort of like weird voodoo totems that unpaid extras would carry in Cecil B. DeMille movies
doctorow at August 17th, 2013 04:33 — #6
jim1234 at August 17th, 2013 08:16 — #7
If you like Pierre Matter, you might also like Al Wadzinski's work.
deidzoeb at August 19th, 2013 11:13 — #8
Giger minus the creep factor = doing it wrong.
doctorow at August 22nd, 2013 00:06 — #9
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.