frauenfelder at November 1st, 2013 13:41 — #1
les_weiler at November 1st, 2013 13:54 — #2
Neat! I'm astounded that none of the Amazon reviews I've seen have mentioned House Of Leaves. The concept and execution seem very similar. Looking forward to it.
gilbertwham at November 1st, 2013 14:06 — #3
Yup. My immediate thought was, "It's like House of Leaves! With bits you can lose!"
jhbadger at November 1st, 2013 14:15 — #4
I hope this will be authentic to the J.J. Abrams tradition and will include:
1) Literary depictions of lens-flares
2) Abandonment of major plot points for no particular reason
3) A nonsensical ending that makes one regret ever spending time on it.
plopiccolo at November 1st, 2013 14:37 — #5
How do they fit lens flares in a book?
grey_devil at November 1st, 2013 15:28 — #6
Really inventive concept, though i wonder if there isn't a hidden ARG associated with this... if not then it seems like a lost opportunity.
freshacconci at November 1st, 2013 15:52 — #7
How do I get in on that "conceived of" deal? Any writers want to do the actual work? I'll be your ideas man in exchange for top billing.
samsa at November 1st, 2013 16:05 — #8
People are desperate to ride the JJ Abrams train. Not so for the freshacconci train.
wrecksdart at November 1st, 2013 16:22 — #9
House of Leaves. I am attempting to suppress a shudder as I consider that title again. "S" looks like a beautiful work, to say the least. Curious to see how it reads...
timothy_krause at November 1st, 2013 16:33 — #10
He made a TV show–carnival ride–plodding snoozefest that thought it was a book, and now a book that thinks it's a TV show–carnival ride (and that looks to me like a plodding snoozefest). Quite an innovator, that J. J.
timothy_krause at November 1st, 2013 16:42 — #11
Amazon currently has it ranked #1 in the category of "Sea Adventure Fiction": poor Homer, poor Melville, poor O'Brian.
It would be great to actually read excerpts of the book: I kind of feel bad snarking about it, but it does seem like a mid-concept mishmash of Danielewski, Safran Foer's Bruno Schulz book, and those Griffin and Sabine books from way back, with a dash of Myst and those oh-so-sly viral hijinks that Abrams uses to promote his films and TV. Which could be either lots of fun or the worstest ever.
missunderwood at November 1st, 2013 17:57 — #12
I, too, thought the whole thing had Griffin and Sabine written all over it, so to speak.
prometheansky at November 1st, 2013 18:02 — #13
Good luck getting an intact copy from the library. At least House of Leaves just had unusual printing.
greermahoney at November 1st, 2013 19:40 — #14
House of Leaves was my thought, too. Also, I want to go on record to say that any book with loose pieces in it is a terrible idea.
jojo_fine at November 1st, 2013 19:46 — #15
When you think about it, a deliberately burned page is kind of like a lensflare for a book.
daemonworks at November 2nd, 2013 01:18 — #17
Hmm. I don't buy it. No lens flare.
brainspore at November 2nd, 2013 01:26 — #18
It's the first installment in a prequel trilogy to Thomas Pynchon's V.
numfar at November 2nd, 2013 07:29 — #19
A good library will bind the loose pieces into the book.
hmsgoose at November 2nd, 2013 16:12 — #20
Unless it's some kind of bizarre DRM / loaning prevention. The book just falls apart as you read it, so you can only ever really read it once. You can share this book with others IF you can remember where to stuff everything back in.
gamzeyaavor at November 3rd, 2013 03:45 — #21
Abrams is no newbie to print experimentation. Re his Wired magazine special issue: http://www.wired.com/wired/issue/17-05
next page →