But I do doubt that that was the implication of what they said. Rather it was a moment of perspective, a more intelligent version of the ever annoying “#firstworldproblems” meme.
We should keep in mind that we’re rallying against basically forum trolls in the arena of first world media culture, and putting down organized state-sponsored regimes of oppression, or deep institutional discrimination. This doesn’t mean people should react, just they should realize that they are fighting a minor skirmish in a giant and bloody war, and not the war itself (to use the annoying military speak). Its still worth standing up to, obviously.
Again, not the OP… They might have meant something completely different, and this is only my (potentially very wrong) interpretation of their words.
I’m not going to commit to one side or another of the gamercaust, as I haven’t played anything more involving than kmahjongg for a few years now. The larger issues are what I was speaking to, and the lazy tropes of bigotry are so toned down and coded now that they really don’t belong in any competent expression of art at all, regardless of the medium. There’s historical context, sure, but only to the extent that the POV and expectations of the characters will be something distinctly separate from the POV and expectations of most readers/viewers/players.
Agreed fully on this point. This here extends far beyond culture struggles and very much into daily life. How we speak about a third party affects not only them but our own thoughts as well and seems to lead very quickly into the paradox of tolerance problem which essentially dehumanizes the self as well as the other.
As for your main point, if I think for a moment, my objection to the “warrior” term in the social context is that of hyperbole as well as the false equivalence you mention.
That would be an odd sentiment for him, since such a separation hadn’t really been contemplated, and it seems to be a misattribution.
It looks like the full quote is “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards”, from British officer William Butler.
I’m not a slactivist, I’m a theatre-level grand strategist of social justice. You can tell by the pompous affect and cushy chair miles behind the lines.