Aristotle also thought that men had more teeth than women, so.
Aristotle is often a surprisingly sharp observer of the natural world, but if you listen to him about people, you are going to find that teenage girls should be married off to middle-aged men and some people are just naturally meant to be slaves. Somehow I am not surprised DâSouza thinks he is a perfect go-to source.
The guy did this to a woman clearly at the bar with her husband, and put it so much it probably would have killed her, considering how sick it made her husband.
Really saying the quiet parts super loud, now, arenât they? This shriveled old bigot firmly believes women are chattel to be handed out and passed around.
He can fuck right off the nearest short pier.
Strapped to a very spiky anchor.
There is a sense in which the central purpose of every society is to figure out the distribution of women because women are valuable. Theyâre valuable not just for their company and for their way of looking at things and for sex, which is a lot of fun, but also because they are the only path there is to continuing your genetic inheritance. That is the way it is.
Huh. Notably missing is the part where women are people, with value and dignity as people.
Also, when Jordan Bordan Peterson went off on âEnforced Monogamyâ that time, and all his weird fans started dogpiling anyone who pointed out how fucked up that is, claiming ânah, itâs a technical term youâre too ignorant to understandâ (spoiler: it is a technical term in biology, and it doesnât mean what they say it does), and âbut the studies back him upâ (spoiler: the studies he cited at the time actually contradict the underlying thesis)⌠maybe they should have told his other followers all of that. Because it sure seems that they took the same meaning from it that we did: that women are a resource who should each be forcibly allocated to a man, and whose own preferences are perverse and irrelevant.
But we should always be better and let the MAGATs treat us like shit because reasons (according to Thomas Friedman).
Yeah, thatâs 
on purpose, these dipshits literally believe women are not humans. They deny us any agency. We have no thoughts, we cannot articulate anything intelligently, we must be banned from holding jobs, we must be banned from owning homes or keeping bank accounts. Our only value is as incubators and/or helpmeets. Period. Yet. Dog help any one of us who fails to breed then refuses to raise the brood of the next broodmare while simultaneously catering to the oh-so dominant maleâs every sexual predilection. Oh, and the domicile shall be kept spotless or the beatings will continue. For the women and the children.
Let us not forget that children are also chattel slaves in the incel future-hell-verse. None will be safe from abuse - physical or sexual.
If the original statement is true, I donât understand why this wouldnât also be true. Thereâs nothing in that statement that is unique to either gender. Itâs such a bizarre premise.
The AHO says communities who practise breast ironing believe it will make girls less attractive to men, thus protecting them from harassment, rape, abduction, and early forced marriage, and also keeping them in school.
However, health bodies and rights groups say it is a form of physical mutilation that harms a childâs social and psychological wellbeing and contributes to the high school dropout rate among girls who suffer from it.
Cross-posted in the toxic masculinity thread:
Interesting side point:
âŚthe famous saying: âMen are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.â (This is often falsely attributed to novelist Margaret Atwood, who would never be so coy as to use the word âkillâ instead of ârape.â)
So who said it, then?
Isnât it from the Handmaidâs Tale TV series?
Atwood said:
âWhy do men feel threatened by women?â I asked a male friend of mineâŚâTheyâre afraid women will laugh at them,â he saidâŚThen I asked some women studentsâŚâWhy do women feel threatened by men?â âTheyâre afraid of being killed,â they said.
