Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/12/01/a-two-year-olds-approach-to-the-trolley-problem.html
…
It feels crass to say this toddler is thinking like a Turmp voter – caring more about “what’ll happen if” than about the people in front of the train – but there, I’ve already said it
Not to mention a tired cliche at this point.
It’s so great to see the wheels turning. If I just move this one over here…then…I can run over them all over with the train much more easily! That was the goal, right?
There are people who say toddlers lack empathy?
I watched it with the sound off, and when the kid moved the person over to the other track I thought “oh, hey - that’s some great Kobayashi Maru out-of-the-box thinking right there!” Then the kid just ran them all over and I giggled “oh, right. Kids.”
Gotta catch em all!!
“Everyone dies. Existence is pain” he said before he went choo choo with his Thomas The Tank toy
I mean, if you’re gonna murder people, my as well make it thorough.
And this way, with no witnesses he… covered his tracks.
Well, say what you want about this solution, but at least it is fair…
The trolley problem is all about maximizing drama, no matter how contrived. So this kid has successfully understood the problem and maximized the outcome!
If, instead of a runaway trolley you instead posit a runaway epidemic, and instead of an a/b switch you have a menu of painful economic choices, I’d say we are all living out the trolley problem on the wrong track. Except for Jeff Bezos and friends, they’re on the happier track.
In which the AI driving the train decides that the larger problem is too many people causing climate change…
– What’s your name, kid?
– Two Thousand Twenty
Love the “oh oh!” at the end, like it was all some kind of accident
I feel like “forced population transfer” is a bit morally problematic to be a real “solution” to this question.
Me: Oh, how sweet!
Me (moments later): Oh, dear god!
Damn…