There you go again, filtering facts through a very distorted lens.
/s
5 Likes
Isnāt that a mixed metaphor?
1 Like
I suppose, and if so, then all the more apropos.
2 Likes
No one is disputing the factsā¦ I donāt think you get what Iām saying.
CEO of the Discovery channel: $156,077,912
CEO of Microsoft: $84,308,755
CEO of Oracle: $67,261,251
ā¦ ta-da ā with this lens Kullman, Grant, and Allen are vastly underpaid!!
1 Like
3 Likes
What - is that right? How the hell is the Discovery channel guy paid that much???
ETA - oh wait, itās stock awards that may or may not materialize.
2 Likes
Money is the only speech enjoying full freedom in America?
2 Likes
The editor is the gatekeeper as to what does and does not get into the paper. Why does he still have a job?
1 Like
Because if you say āMonsantoā people go āOh shit evil corporation!ā and if you say āDuPont Pioneerā people say āIām sorry, who? Is that a brand of car?ā
3 Likes
Goldman Sachs tends to catch flack. Other firms in the sector (perhaps with less jewish sounding names) are more likely to escape scrutiny.
they disagreed? Ok, so how much did they think the CEOs made?
That sounds like claiming that a signmaker could prevail over a self-driving car maker whose cars try to drive on the pictured roads. Editorial! The Aristocrats!
OT, but I now have a workable strategy when I get to my dissertation defenseā¦ 
4 Likes
Ha, go for it!
Best of luck, and just remember, YOU really are the expert in the room.
3 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
