If he doesn’t like “Mister,” just wait until it’s “Inmate.”
9 Likes
Oh, “Mister” is far more polite than he deserved. Or would receive should I get the opportunity!
10 Likes
9 Likes
Honestly though I think this is probably the most vexing thing he can be called. He doesn’t seem to mind most insults…some like the size of his hands seem to strike home, but most just mean he got under your skin. He can deal with being awful so long as he is especially awful.
Mister, though, is just ordinary. The judge has dealt with misters before and will again, day after day, as just a regular part of her job. It lets you imagine that she would be asked about her day and she wouldn’t even bother to mention what a special person she got to see, and one day he will just be dust in the wind, same as all the regular humans he despises. Mister Trump is a grave that nobody will even care to vandalize, parked along the side of some golf course for a tax break while the world turns on.
9 Likes
We all know that some political cartoonists are extremely right wing, but this one really takes the cake. Notice the exaggerated nose on a supposedly haggard Jack Smith? Meanwhile Trump is big and strong and WASP-y.
The people who read these sorts of cartoons have no idea what reality is, because they think this is a true picture.
2 Likes
As if Trump could/would read a list that long.
7 Likes
That’s the best the cartoonist could come up with? It doesn’t even make sense.
I also thought RWNJs think that Oswald was a victim.
“Harvey Lee Oswald”?
8 Likes
… maybe after Reagan and Cheney 
4 Likes
Is there a way to set up a brewery tour that includes grave site stops as well?
3 Likes
7 Likes
5 Likes
Harvey Lee Harvey Oswald?
I like that he got the two names switched and then he published it. Way to go!
9 Likes
motion for protective order
text of proposed order
The Government’s proposed order is consistent with other such orders commonly used in this District and is not overly restrictive. It allows the defendant prompt and effective use of discovery materials in connection with his defense, including by showing discovery materials to witnesses who also agree to abide by the order’s terms. All the proposed order seeks to prevent is the improper dissemination or use of discovery materials, including to the public. Such a restriction is particularly important in this case because the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him. And in recent days, regarding this case, the defendant has issued multiple posts—either specifically or by implication—including the following, which the defendant posted just hours ago:
If the defendant were to begin issuing public posts using details—or, for example, grand jury transcripts—obtained in discovery here, it could have a harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case. See Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030, 1070 (1991) (“The outcome of a criminal trial is to be decided by impartial jurors, who know as little as possible of the case, based on material admitted into evidence before them in a court proceeding. Extrajudicial comments on, or discussion of, evidence which might never be admitted at trial . . . obviously threaten to undermine this basic tenet.”).
9 Likes
8 Likes
Infamous assassin of F. John Kennedy.
6 Likes
11 Likes
What a mess.
11 Likes
9 Likes
4 Likes
I just love this headline:
8 Likes
