Anyone who claimed Greta Thunberg was a tool of the Right was very far wrong. They have their own young woman now, and she’s just as bad as you feared.
It is such a cliché for superheroes to have to face off against an evil version of themselves. This timeline is just totally played out for ideas if the best the writers can come up with is “Bizarro Greta.”
I have a sneaky feeling this Timeline is actually a simulation called Parody Earth.
“Hailed by climate skeptics”
Stop using that language. There are no climate skeptics, we know with a much better level of certainty that anthropogenic global warming is happening than we do about stuff like evolution.
There are people who understand climate change, and there are deniers.
See also: Idiots.
“It is clear that she is articulating – no matter how inarticulately – age-old tropes of Jewish power and white grievance: the idea that Jews are a privileged class and that white people are oppressed by them,” said Imran Ahmed, the chief executive of the Center for Countering Digital Hate
And of course, not the kind of shit that stops Republicans anymore from embracing those who espouse such tripe. Quite the opposite, actually.
She’s also a neo-nazi. Making her an extra special scumbag on top of science denial.
Well we don’t see people on the left wing carrying torches and chanting anti-semitic slogans
Totally a member of Alternative für Deutschland
not only that, there’s the pedantic fact that language choice matters. they are not skeptical about atmosphere and weather’s existence.
anyhow their heroes the big companies stated full out that it wasn’t happening and then switched to its happening but not mankind caused. we are supposed to go along with that ridiculous behavior even if we DID ignore the paperwork from oil companies admitting this problem long long ago it’d be impossible to sign up with goal post movers unless selfishly in denial.
The contrast is so glaring. Greta Thunberg might not be in a position to judge the work of climate scientists, but at she’s actually read their work, as in plowed through PDFs and emailed the authors asking for clarifications in laymen’s terms. Her speeches indicate she’s read through at least half of the 2018 IPCC report, and rumor has it she’s read through all of it.
Seibt? Not even close.
“Why bother to read such long, detailed examples of Satanic mud people lies and hoaxes and other assorted attempts to defeat the perfect Donald J. Trump?”
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.