The realtors’ greed, combined with their superficiality. If a lickspittle is convinced that the person he’s dealing with is ultra-wealthy then a lot of questions that the merely affluent would be required to answer go un-asked.
For commercial purposes, with rights signed over to the realtor. If an artist showed up saying she was doing a project showing how rich arseholes live I doubt the realtor would agree.
I wonder if boredom could also be one of the reasons? The realtor sitting somewhere… waiting for that phone call? Given all the empty or near empty luxury towers, how often do prospective buyers/tenants show up, with the realtor just itching to get back in the saddle?
A realtor typically has little to lose by (at least initially) treating someone respectfully as a potential buyer even if they don’t know for sure if that person is serious or has the financial resources to make the purchase. Not all wealthy folks outwardly meet the stereotypes, and there are a ton of anecdotes about people asking how much something costs only to have the salesman give the snooty “if you have to ask, you can’t afford it” reply, then later learning that the person really did have the money and bought the goods elsewhere.
Nobody wants to end up being the salesman in one of those anecdotes.
Yes. This is why it’s relatively easy to fool people who sell luxury goods and services just by engaging in borderline cartoonish rich-person cosplay. As I commented on the Anna Sorokin article linked above, her marks:
If you have some bling and a bit of Tom Ripley in you, you can con your way into viewing and photographing an $80-million condo with no questions asked. Or, in the case of Sorokin:
As for the “Pretty Woman” anecdotes, I lived one. After I landed my first high-paying job I went to the Armani Exchange in my Manhattan neighbourhood with the intent of buying an entire new wardrobe. I spent 15 minutes wandering around the store in my geeky normcore outfit and being studiously ignored by the salespeople, many of whom were licking the boots of customers who looked the part. Someone lost a hefty commission that day and Armani lost a customer for life.
I hate to be the guy - but this photo is clearly fake.
It is impossible for a camera to have straight perspective on the window frame but curved perspective on the view behind. In other words straight lines on the window frame must align with straight lines on the buildings.
Looks like this photographer is fooling everyone.
That’s perhaps the most infuriating aspect of all. Not that people spend tens of millions for luxury apartment buildings with amazing views, but that nobody ever even sets foot in them.
Any salesperson working a luxury store in Silicon Valley would learn a lesson pretty quickly that this is the wrong way to profile customers. It’s not uncommon to see billionaires in schlubby clothes driving shitboxes.
Whether or not it’s fake (and it’s been established that it wasn’t her photo), real estate photography is a game of manipulation.
Forced perspectives and/or super wide angle lenses to make tiny spaces look much larger. Taking a photo of the same room from many angles to make it look like different rooms. Photoshopping flames into fireplaces (my personal “favorite”). Enhancing overall appearance by boosting contrast, manipulating colors, and removing blemishes.
Whenever I see listings for units in my condo complex I’m stunned at the level of manipulation that takes place. A tiny ground floor 500sq ft unit with low ceilings that’s also partially below grade can be made to look bright and palatial simply by using clever angles and photo processing.