How in the world can DC screw this up so badly? Not only is this an incredible and reflexive linguistic missed opportunity, it also provides a perfect chance to actively define to serve and protect.
It sounds like DC didn’t want to offend parents’ wallets – violence is acceptable but Dog forbid we hint that the Heroes make any flavors of love other than vanilla.
Yeah, no one ever suggested Bruce Wayne indulged himself in anything sexual… /s
Never seen the show, but considering it is billed as an adult entertainment series, rated TV-MA, means sex is one of those things one can expect to encounter. And I assume the subject of sex has already been explored previously. Therefore, it is rather silly to draw some arbitrary line.
Besides, we all know that Batman would be some sort of hard core masochistic. Shit, Catwoman already has a whip. Sure sure, he could probably escape the bindings if he wanted, but he doesn’t want to. He’s been a bad bat and deserves everything coming to him.
Still not the worst lover in the Justice League.
I guess I misunderstood the meaning of hero. I thought it meant someone who did the right thing despite the forces that would oppose them.
That is a rather specific headline.
-Michael Chabon, *The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay*
Complete with the anatomically improbable positioning of the female superhero!
BOOYAH!!!
I love the Teen Titan version of Cyborg.
the Joker takes lewd photographs of Batgirl after shooting her in a spine
How many spines did she have?
My husband this morning: look love, I’m officially better than Batman.
No, that’s Manbat.
“Nobody cared who I went down on until I put on the mask.”
That’s what I was wondering when it mentioned just women
I thought it was canon he was into young men?
Why else Robin?