That’s a philosophical question. Reminds me of when Jean Paul Sartre pitched for Dodge Dart, “In my journey to the end of night, I must rely not only on dialectical paths of reason. I must have a good solid automobile, one that eschews the futile trappings of worldly ennui and asks only for basic maintenance. My Dodge Dartre offers me this elemental solace, and as interior parts fall off I am struck by the realization of their pointlessness. I might not know if the window is up or down. It is of no consequence."
I’m sure there’s a good reason why this is not feasible, but… I envision a warning bar - or more precisely, one on each of the approach roads - about 1/2 a block away (to allow time/distance for a change of heart.)
Said warning bars would be significantly higher than the bridge, but would have heavy weights suspended at the level of the bridge; ideally, they’d hit hard enough to make a loud-ass noise, but swing up and out of the way so as not to cause too much damage. It’s pretty obvious that signs aren’t cutting it.
I appreciate this is a long-running story, so I’m not at all criticising you, but all these points have been considered and either dismissed or implemented.
There’s a road junction at the bridge, so it’s not feasible to put bars further away.
Actually not a bad idea but, since it would cost money, not one that is likely to be applied – rental trucks are notoriously sparse stripped-down affairs. My Outback has systems that seem to know within inches how close something is and their relative velocities and which warn me noisily and then actually slams on the brakes if I am not proactive.