Well, since Mark doesn’t read these comments… His lack of reading of them why he kept comments turned off on his posts recently. He’s found it less than enjoyable to read the BBS so he doesn’t. So people can complain about the writers not doing it right but it is to a peanut gallery.
And, frankly, regardless of the fact that the guy was irate with a gun, when a Hell’s Angel, with support of his friends, beats a man to death, I have a hard time believing it is “self-defense.” That’s not a casual thing. Before the man is dead, you can stop. He isn’t fighting back by the time he dies. It’s over the top and gratuitous but, yes, the special snowflakes here ignore the fact that the notoriously violent and racist Hell’s Angels beat a black guy to death and say “Well, an all white jury agreed it was self-defense.” I don’t buy it. It might have been but we never got the other guy’s version of what happened. Only some film footage and a story by a bunch of self-serving folks who were on the hook for killing a guy.