CNN anchor on Ferguson: 'Why not, perhaps, use water cannons?'

sounds too much like race-mixing.

Nope. Rosemary Church joined CNN International in August 1998 as an anchor on World News, based in the networkā€™s Atlanta headquarters.

I dunno. Iā€™m Australian, and was unaware of the historical significance of water cannon use in the US, but I still took one look at the headline and saw a gaff, just based on the detached naivety of suggesting another equally bad violent crowd control solution, rather than suggesting they rely more on police liaison and other de-escalation strategies.

Upon further reading I saw why there was such a big stink about it, but its a pretty dumb comment even devoid of cultural context.

3 Likes

I know this is a classic meme, but at least the current legal outcome is that a dingo did get her baby.

http://www.nt.gov.au/justice/courtsupp/coroner/findings/other/chamberlain_findings.pdf

1 Like

To think a few years ago, we were complaining about a cop wielding pepper spray.

2 Likes

Right, anyone who has spent the last 16 years living in Americaā€™s Deep South should have at least a basic understanding of the history of the civil rights movement. Birmingham is only a two hour drive away from CNNā€™s headquarters, for crying out loud.

4 Likes

+50.

Even if sheā€™s stupid enough to not read or know about history, she should at least understand that suggesting a less-violent means of breaking up non-violent protest is not a lot better than endorsing the terrible status quo.

1 Like

That is not how a limerick works. Try this:

There was an anchor from down under
Whose ignorance caused her to blunder
She said cops should use hoses
Might as well say ā€œuse rosesā€
So the cops could remake Kent Stateā€™s thunder.

Yes, I know Iā€™m nitpicking (and the emphasis on ā€œanchorā€ still doesnā€™t quite fit), but dammit, if youā€™re going to attempt a specific verse form you canā€™t just cram however many syllables you like into a line and pretend it still scans. Itā€™s like if you went to a rock show and the drummer just sort of banged away whenever he felt like it, like a toddler with a spoon and a pot. Keep the damn rhythm! THIS HAS BEEN YOUR UNWELCOME EDUCATION FOR TODAY.

5 Likes

I was at that Foo Fighters gig, too.

Man, fuck drum solos.

1 Like

Why not, perhaps, use blonde bimbo cannons? Certainly a blonde bimbo flying through the air would stop any and all rioters cold in their tracks.

1 Like

Yes I can! The ā€˜likesā€™ count tells me so!

Message me for a phone number, and Iā€™ll read it to you. My rhythm is eccentric, but internally consistent, and when spoken aloud will scan. If you donā€™t agree after the phone call, Iā€™ll write a traditional one apologizing. Itā€™ll begin: ā€œEppy fell on his swordā€¦ā€

It is not anapestic, nor even amphibrachic, but it is a limerick.

ps. you have a typo in your correction.

3 Likes

Water cannons nowadays arenā€™t fire-trucks though. These are specialist vehicles.

I was also a little confused about the tone of the post until the comments.

1 Like

Pressure. Lots and lots of pressure.

Iā€™d be inclined to doubt it. Not because of any improvements in tact; but because of the fairly massive increase in availability of purpose-built anti-riot weaponry.

Itā€™s actually a bit creepy. Look at any of the iconic Bull Connor-era pictures: the cops look dressed for desk duty(shirt, tie, hat, no ballistic armor or pads) and the only vehicles are some patrol cars and fire trucks hastily drafted for the job.

Compare to a contemporary disturbance of some flavor, where assorted black APCs will be rumbling around among phalanxes of armored officers with a mixture of shield/baton, chemical grenade launchers, and the ubiquitous big-bundle-oā€™-zip-ties.

This is (I hope obviously) no defense of the virtue of such cops; but the reason they were turning fire hoses(taken from the fire department, not mounted on dedicated riot-control vehicles) and K9 units on demonstrators is because thatā€™s about all they had. No APCs, no LRADs, no chemical weapons, no riot armor, no tasers, limited or no ā€˜less lethalā€™ munitions.

1 Like

Precisely. Thatā€™s why in another thread, I suggested they sue, empty the municipal buildings and start over. Seriously. They need a re-do.

2 Likes

They did in fact use police dogs early on.

1 Like

Or a little ice, ice, babyā€¦

or, instead of a water canon, how about they stop attacking citizens exorcising their right to assembly?

5 Likes

Nitpick on your spelling, itā€™s ā€˜ā€˜exercisingā€™ā€™

The police are ā€˜ā€˜exorcisingā€™ā€™ the citizens right to peaceably assemble, though.

4 Likes

perhaps rather than water cannons they need Catholic priests with holy water.

1 Like