Russia:
Seriously yikes. Letâs hope for the best, even if we fear the worst.
12 days ago, I posted this:
The trend of almost completely linear growth has continued. Another 12 days, and weâre at 5 million.
The root cause of the linear trend is not reassuring, though. In this other post of mine, I talked about the emergence of new centres of transmission for the disease, in South America, South Asia, and the MENA region.
Well, thatâs continuing. As the number of new cases falls in Europe and North America, these areas are still showing increases in the number of new infections each day. The shift of the impact towards the global south continues.
I also posted about Iran.
The cautionary tale continues. Relax the lockdown too early and you will get a second wave, one that is still increasing:
Finally, if the virus wasnât a problem enough on its own, India and Bangladesh are now going to have to deal with the aftermath of a massive cyclone as well:
Where the virus will hamper disaster recovery efforts to deal with the cyclone, and the cyclone will hamper efforts to deal with the virus.
So they were, in fact, pursuing a herd immunity strategy. And failing.
They continue to claim quite firmly, as they always have, that herd immunity was not their strategy, only a possible (and of course desirable) byproduct.
Iâve noticed in sports that players rarely intend to foul other players, yet we still need officials and they still call fouls.
The fact that Tegnell is disappointed with a low positive antibody rate shows that, whether they call it by name or not, Sweden was pursuing a herd immunity strategy. The fact that Britton is flailing about for a reason why it isnât working just shows that they messed up.
I think they fell into the trap of âas long as our medical system isnât overwhelmed weâll be fine!â instead of âeven if our medical system isnât overwhelmed, we could lose hundreds of thousands of people to a particularly horrible death!â
Thatâs like saying that had NASA expressed disappointment with the flavor of Tang, that would have been proof that the space programâs main goal was tasty breakfast drinks. I donât see any reason to doubt Swedenâs expressed intentions.
I think we should all be disappointed when high levels of infection, in any country, do not result in evidence of immunity. Sweden is a cautionary tale, since their level of social distancing, while nominally not locked down, is as high as that of many places which are locked down, and higher than many places which are now opening up.
Oh, nonsense. Thatâs a terrible analogy. Donât be insulting.
I do. The numbers. They donât lie. Whether it was intentional or mistakes were made, the numbers show the reality. Sweden gambled with either a herd immunity or benign neglect strategy (which amount to the same thing, in action), and it failed. Plain and simple.
So why is their death toll worse than countries that didnât lock down at all until it was too late and who did see their medical systems completely overwhelmed?
Thatâs an honest question, and one Tegnell should be too busy desperately trying to figure out to give any interviews.
Some avenues for him to pursue:
- Maybe actually reports of their voluntary measures are overinflated.
- Perhaps people are not honestly reporting their behavior with respect to the voluntary measures.*
- Possibly the outbreak has been especially bad in certain communities who didnât understand or could not comply with the voluntary measures
- �
Seriously, worse than the US? I wonder under what circumstances he would contemplate resigning.
* I happen to know for a fact that while some people in Sweden were sheltering in place, others (in the same family) were making cross-country train trips for social calls.
And a reminderâŚ
Sweden could still look good in the long run: absent a vaccine, or an amazing global social distancing response, the ultimate death toll will not be 6/million, it will be 10,000/million. But this strategy is obviously not working.
What in the world was that?
Who?
What?
When?
Where?
and Why?
Noun 1. berserker - one of the ancient Norse warriors legendary for working themselves into a frenzy before a battle and fighting with reckless savagery and insane fury.
Is this really what youâre trying to say about someone?
For someone who doesnât like vegetables, he sure loves to serve up the word salad
A new Bentley Continental is only 200-300k USD. Iâll pay ÂŁ50 and expect a full tank* and legal tyres.
* If I actually had the desire and means to own a Bentley, I would be pulling out the ICE and making it electric, if only to feel the hate from Jeremy Clarkson.
âWhat fresh hell is thisâ indeed.
No, it expresses exactly their point, that it is a desirable byproduct, not their stated goal.
I do. The numbers. They donât lie.
The numbers donât give intentions. Whether or not the leaders are pursuing the best possible strategy â and nobody knows what that is yet â they are by all accounts people of unimpeachable integrity, and so I am inclined to take these statements (if not their predictions) at face value.
In any event, I think you and I â and anyone reading these and our earlier posts â know where each of us stand on this, I donât see any point in continuing what is essentially an argument about whether a certain label is appropriate.
As far as I can tell from the Swedish newspapers, the high death toll is mainly in Stockholm; in other Swedish cities it doesnât seem much higher than, say, Oslo. Moreover, a very high number of the deaths are of the elderly. I did read one editorial complaining that the Swedes are more willing to stick their aging parents/grandparents in residential care communities than their Scandinavian neighbors.
Tegnell should be too busy desperately trying to figure out to give any interviews.
In Sweden leadership in coronavirus policy is given wholly over to the State Epidemiologist, with little power to the politicians. This is the opposite of countries like the US where experts are blocked out of authority. Probably some intermediate position is optimal. Meanwhile, as the main leader on this he needs to be accessible to the public. And I expect that his department is trying to work out these things.
Maybe actually reports of their voluntary measures are overinflated.
These have been verified in the local (Norwegian) coverage, and believe me, Norway is not a fan of the Swedish approach. (In fact, Norway is trying to cut a deal with the other Nordic countries for free travel which would exclude Sweden.)
There are strange anomalies with the numbers in the various countries, and I think it is too easy to jump quickly to conclusions about them, especially when it is filtered through press reports. I think in the final analysis it is going to boil down to a few activities where Sweden did not distance enough, like gyms and bars; to the fact that Swedenâs national skiing holiday was a week earlier than that of other countries in the region; to really poor protocols in shared-living facilities; etc.
The thing is, even if Swedenâs policies were wildly successful in Sweden, they probably wouldnât work in the US, just as the careful opening up of other European countries shouldnât be used too cavalierly as a road map for the US.
I donât see that we Americans have any moral high ground when judging the Swedish policies. Iâm personally hoping I can avoid passing through Sweden on my way home, but I also recognize that the low infection rates both where I am now and at home are not necessarily due to more intelligent political decisions, but rather to a whole host of circumstances.
(ETA, to avoid multiple posts):
Thatâs pretty misleading. That is just over the last 7 days. The UK is still 50% higher overall. But, the Telegraph is always happy to give Boris Johnson some help.
I am trying to say a nice thing about Symone Sanders. I guess I have to apologize for being the first person to ever be hyperbolic on Boing Boing?
(As it happens, there is some disagreement over whether âberserkerâ has negative connotations; it doesnât in my current neighborhood. However, I absolutely donât regret any negativity in my depiction of the attacker, whose behavior was angry and irresponsible.)