Thanks for posting this.
I’m not competent to judge if the reported science is correct, but there are serveral things about the article that make me uneasy–as if I were reading highly sophisticated disinformation.
I’ll have to re-read it with a more critical eye, but I can’t help noticing how well its criticisms of countries, institutions and even individuals align with, for example, the priorities of the late US administration.
If nothing else, the author himself definitely has an axe to grind. Throughout the piece, he’s careful to point out that there is no direct evidence for either scenario, but later criticizes media outlets that haven’t treated the escape scenario with the seriousness he thinks appropriate as “left” and “ideological”:
Another reason, perhaps, is the migration of much of the media toward the left of the political spectrum. Because President Trump said the virus had escaped from a Wuhan lab, editors gave the idea little credence.
The common sense perception that a pandemic breaking out in Wuhan might have something to do with a Wuhan lab cooking up novel viruses of maximal danger in unsafe conditions could eventually displace the ideological insistence that whatever Trump said can’t be true.
It’s interesting and informative, but I’m nervous about it.