The aggressor has PINK short pants on?
My previous thoughts on PINK short pants will be re-evaluatedâŚ
Yeah, thatâs what I came to comment. Pretty belligerent for guy wearing hot pink shorts. And I think heâs wearing crocs.
The âcrocsâ are the last straw for me, tooâŚ
Man, I canât wait for the next season of Trailer Park Boys.
Just needed one of them to look up and yell âFuck off, Lahey!â
iâm not really getting how the cop was really the one diffusing the situation here.
*defusing
But clearly, the ragers heard the officer. You can see pink-shorts point at him, and you can even faintly hear âlisten to the officer,â spake by pink-shorts.
doh, i always get those confused. : )
i guess he had an effect on the situation, but it seemed like they were both ready to go off in a huff anyway, whether or not the officer on the bridge yelled insults at them or not.
BUT he didnât shoot anyone! âŚoh Canadian cop, that makes more sense.
Being Canada, it was probably something like this, âI told you to go first!â
âNo way, eh, you were clearly ahead of me, I told you to go first.â
âNo, I insisted that you take the spot ahead of me.â
âAnd while I appreciate the offer, I respectfully decline and insist you go ahead of me.â
Yeah, I couldnât really understand why the cop was just talking the whole time. Do Canadian cops not carry guns?
Alternate sound track for the argument.
Yes, of course, but it just goes to show that they donât always need to use them. Good on the cop.
And nobody got shot. Go figger.
It would have been a good way of finding out that American cops are now issued sniper rifles.
They do, but rarely use them. My in-lawsâ next-door neighbor was OPP for 25 years, and never once had to pull his gun (that was his claim, at least).
âHad toâ is an interesting way to put that.
good use of spake.
the aggressor was just a bluffer, and likely the one at fault (if there was a rear-ender).
