Isn’t the ratio of replies to views most impressive?
1 Like
I certainly wasn’t in a stable state of mind while spamming Jethro Tull videos–will you gently remind me to stop if I do it again?
An aircraft hangar with 40 people is different than an elevator with 40 people, right?
Would “Do you want to answer?” work as well as a thread?
Would we just be answering or “playing answers”?
I think, yes?
Would we have to answer in the form of a question?
Do we need such arbitrary constraints?
Isn’t that what we’re doing now?
If we had them, wouldn’t they just get ignored?
1 Like
Are we compelled to, though? Don’t we have free will?
Maybe?
Why would I want to ruin that fun?
Who are you replying to? Are you suggesting that answers would be ignored?
I think, not?
Does it matter? But then, does anything matter? I mean, what you get right down to it, what is it all about?
What’s all this then, aaaamen?
Monty Python Live At The Hollywood Bowl - Bishop on the Landing aka Sal…:
2 Likes
It only goes to show that it’s somehow easier to write this shit than it is to read it… right?
3 Likes
Could it be that those prone to reading through a thread like this are more likely to leave multiple responses? Will we see the numbers shift once people stop posting, or will the posts always exceed the views?
1 Like
Assuming the thread doesn’t get closed, I don’t see how anyone could bother taking a glance at this thread without leaving their $0.02 behind, don’t you think? Isn’t this like some kinda Boing Boing Blarney Stone?
1 Like
