Do you have negative ESP?

I so want that for my cubicle now.

5 Likes

6 Likes

11 Likes

The (scanned) article snippet says “consistently below chance” - so I’m assuming they’re referring to tests in which they’ve disproved the null hypothesis.

1 Like

5 Likes

Douglas Dean’s book was a demonstration that the executives whose companies increase profits the most, score far higher than average on precognition tests. Surely he was applying careful and methodical scientific research to selling pop-sci books on the correlation between business success and PSI.

3 Likes

Ah well then. Perhaps not.

On a side note, I’ve noticed there’s a whole genre of writings and other endeavours dedicated to revealing the hidden causes of becoming rich. It’s become a sort of modern day quest for the philosopher’s stone. Has to be one of the saddest human activities going.

4 Likes

Shouldn’t probability even everyone’s aggregate experience out over time?

1 Like

So does yours; it has replied to me but quoted someone else.
Things are so complicated nowadays. In the past the only real problem was keyboards that couldn’t spell properly.

6 Likes

If there’s no effect, then yes. But if there is an effect then the opposite happens – aggregation though meta-analysis increases the sample size and makes small effects more statistically significant.

Meta-analysis is big in the sciences these days, both hard (like physics) and softer (like parapsychology).

1 Like

Or they met the guy from Intacto.

By ‘effect’ do you mean positive or negative feedback - like each drink making the next drink feel like an even better idea?

2 Likes

I believe this can be explained by the fact that I recently changed the screensaver from seven four leaf clovers and horseshoes dancing around a rabbit foot to thirteen black cats walking across the screen under ladders while toppling salt shakers and breaking mirrors as they go.

5 Likes

We can’t really explain what mass is, but we certainly know when we collide with a lamppost.

However…when I was at school we had someone in another class who definitely radiated bad luck. It was claimed that he could break laboratory glassware just by looking at it, and he was in the room when my ionisation chamber went haywire, and in the next room when the belt broke on the van der Graaf. I believe he passed the Cambridge scholarship exam so he didn’t need to do well in the physics and chemistry practicals. He then managed nearly to kill himself on a motorcycle. I have to admit that I kept well away from him, despite being in the same college, in case it was catching.

5 Likes

Hard and soft science seem to me to be the other way round. Tremendous progress has been made in physics, so it must be quite easy, a nice soft life for its students. No progress at all has been made in parapsychology, so it must be hard.
After all, it couldn’t possibly be that parapsychology is unscientific mumbo-jumbo with a top dressing of poor experimental method and misapplied statistics, could it?

2 Likes

14 Likes

Do you have negative ESP?

No I don’t, but I’m sure my Boss has it.

5 Likes

I don’t win raffles or drawings. Except in the very rare circumstance where the prize is something I already own and cannot use another one of. This has happened twice.

Mr. Bells’ office Christmas party has a raffle every year. You play casino games for tickets. Last year, they didn’t have poker (which is my favorite), so I did karaoke all night instead. Mr. Bells won a bunch of raffle tickets and asked me what prizes we should put in for. I told him that we wouldn’t win any if I chose, so he should do it all on his own. His was the first name drawn.

8 Likes

7 Likes

That is such a great movie