Thanks for the explanation, I have never heard that in english.
Ok, when you say supremacist you don’t mean skinnhead (activist supremacist), you mean that the Europeans arrived, and instead of dropping their culture and assimilate into the native culture they, thinking theirs was the superior culture, forced it on the unwilling natives. Unfortunately for the native population, part of the european culture was the fact that non europeans where subhuman. Hundreds of years later, the decendants of these “original” europeans obliviously live in this eurocentric place that now priviliges them over the original natives. Did I get that right?
Ok, this is an interesting conversation then. Before Pixie’s explanation the whole thread was a bit confusing. My guess is that most in this thread are more familiar with the nuances accepted where as some of us that are new to this thread read it as something else.
With this premise in mind, what would be a “hail mary” (no pun intended) solution to rectify this, say in the USA?
I guess the subject of imigration and what constitutes a native population and culture is a little too boring for this forum. We will just let this unimportant subject resolve itself as it histoically has.