Oh, holy shit. Really?
edit
I mean, the only thing I can think of is that the guy was looking straight ahead and everybody else appeared to make eye contact.
Oh, holy shit. Really?
edit
I mean, the only thing I can think of is that the guy was looking straight ahead and everybody else appeared to make eye contact.
Thatâs why the American revolution was won entirely without bloodshed!
No, he purposely switched the brass pole-thingy he was holding to his right hand as a subtle, classy way to avoid showing any deference to the Orange One.
Ugh⌠thatâs horrible to read.
Yeah he made some weird twists in his thinking which I glossed over after getting the main point. That was a mistake. I was OK with that because I thought (and still think) the no violence point is, as I see things at least, the more compelling argument.
And Sean Spicer just keeps digging. Quote from his first appearance since lying about the size of the inauguration crowd:
âI believe that we have to be honest with the American people, but I think sometimes we can disagree with the facts,â Spicer told reporters Monday in the first press briefing under President Donald Trump.
He then reiterated his lies about the attendance numbers and again berated the reporter who had incorrectly claimed that a bust of MLK had been removed from the White House, asking the man where his apology is, despite Spicer having already (on Twitter) publicly accepted his apologies.
Such a gentleman, this Trump guyâŚ
Did Trump just effectively shut down the EPA? With no grants, no contracts, no tasks and no work assignments⌠whatâs left?
When The Economist starts dissing a Republican President shit has got bad.
My point exactly!
Thatâs the best version yet! Scans better than any of the others.
Hereâs a shock.
Wonder if Trump still stands to benefit personally from these?
How can this fuckery be legal?
Itâs not. Supremacy clause.
Do you have faith in the Texas Supreme Court deciding that? Or a SCOTUS with a Trump appointee added?
Yeah, I know, and rightfully there should be no chance that the Texas GOP will succeed. The article doesnât make that seem a certainty though.