I dunno, I think there’s a chance it may fall under ass-ault.
3 Likes
Beat me to it.
1 Like
Schnews! There’s a name I haven’t heard in a while.
1 Like
The assailant, Heinz Bekkerbeanz, 57, was charged with flatulence in the turd degree and criminal injury to a police dog.
Distraught canine handler Fritz Boomtish said “I cut off mein dog’s nose und he still smelled bad” after his Schnauzer copped a lethal whiff.
3 Likes
Also when “farting with full intent” there is always a 50/50 chance of accidentally following through.
4 Likes
Phew! Luckily there was no police around when as kids we did fart lighting contests.
3 Likes
“I’m not farting AT you, I’m farting WITH you.”
6 Likes
Tbh, I thought it was gonna be Vienna, Virginia.
1 Like
They would simply cite the recent court decision that established the principle popularly referred to as “tear gas, not rear gas”.
5 Likes
You schnews, you lose.
1 Like
€500!?! That sumbitch musta been EPIC!
2 Likes
Taking your question literally, yes, IF it’s being used as “speech”, after some Googling. In the above case, it would almost certainly be protected.
1 Like
Methane=Free Speech
1 Like
Methane is protected.
Yourthane is not.
5 Likes
If there is one thing that we can be sure of in these troubled times, it is that this perpetrator was no gentleman.
1 Like
There are medical conditions and the treatment thereof, that causes the sufferer to fart a lot and involuntarily.
1 Like
Massive Intestinal Wind is my Ted Nugent cover band.
3 Likes
How dare you!
1 Like
It’s a good thing too, we know where this kind of behavior can lead if it continues to escalate!
1 Like
