Do you only find out once you lick the box?
12 Likes
This particular Metro toilet screamed cruising spot. I noticed a few leather and bear type guys going in; there were two twinks primping and giggling in a nearby photo booth. As I sat waiting I noticed all of the men exiting or entering the rest room were all going to/from the entrance, none to the trains.
He’d been in some time and I had started to wonder when 2 cops walked in, and they didn’t come out in a reasonable time. Oh, shit! Someone came out and I asked if the cops were were trying to disperse or arresting the guys in there. The guy laughed, gave me an oh, honey look and told me behind the door was a corridor with a police sub-station across from the toilets.
When the ex finally came out, in answer to why he took so long he said,“Guys were looking at my cock, so I had to wait for a stall.”
When there’s a bunch of men hanging around pissiors late night close to a few gay bars…well, tried to steer him away. But he had to go into every one he saw after I explained those weren’t weird fountains…and ask me to take pictures!
7 Likes
The guessing game at Timmies is less interesting.
2 Likes
Coincidentally, when I was about 18 I lived next door to some guys from Eritrea. You’re right. They were not gay but affectionate and would dance with each other all the time. I rejected the offer whenever they invited me 
This is what now comes to mind any time I see the phrase “gay agenda”. Also doubles as an example of how seriously that phrase should ever be taken.
2 Likes
Lick the box jokes are to me, what fart jokes are to many.
I lost this round but I’ll be back.
4 Likes
(Video cued to relevant bit.*)
* But fun to watch the whole thing.
It’s how seriously all people should take it, but unfortunately some people do take the idea of a “Gay Agenda” seriously. These songs were not written entirely from imagination.
2 Likes
I’ll take any Montechristo over anything Starbucks offers, on any day.
1 Like
Ah, thanks for the explanation - I guess it comes down to location, location, location.
1 Like
I wonder how much of this “outrage” truly exists. I mean, I found several news sites reporting about the outrage. But, for instance, the Huffington Post article about this included just three tweets that actually talk about this negatively. And a quick twitter search resulted mostly in people being outraged by the supposed outrage (as in, progressive people reading these news articles and thinking “come on, stupid conservatives”). Don’t get me wrong, it is silly to get outraged about a couple holding hands, but I wonder how many people are seriously outraged vs people who are seriously outraged because they think people are outraged about this.
What, even made into a hot beverage?
The most expensive bad cup of “tea” ever made.
1 Like
There is your problem. HuffPost is sort of the left wing Fox News.
1 Like
Do fundamentalists drink Starbucks? and other navel gazing.
It just won’t do to let a Montechristo go to waste.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mg2N0dOb_jM&t=18s
I remember “Glad to be Gay” at The Secret Policeman’s Ball. It was stuck in my head for weeks. I was humming, and almost singing the chorus many times.
Thanks. It’s a good song.
…aand it’s back in my head again.
1 Like
True, but that’s what gets picked up around the net. Dumb, clickbait, headlines. And before you know it, other news sites start reporting on it because Huffington Post or Fox News created some “outrage” out of a handful of tweets.
Tom Robinson is constantly updating it, with both the good and bad things that lgbt people are experiencing.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
