Very strange, you are willing to endorse a ‘skat-lover marriage’ even though you find it ‘gross’.
Maybe your local school could invite ‘skat-lovers’ for a demonstration of ‘true love’. And even when these ‘skat-lovers’ are vocal, joining your “gay pride” (oxymoron) parade and bellowing out their pervertions (no doubt sponsered by a certain ice cream company) you still won’t lobby against it. Now you’re stuck, complaining about anything sex related, would now make you a hypocrite. You truly are a classic example of the ‘thin end of the wedge’ - allow homosexual behaviour to flourish and sexual perversion will inevitably increase.
1 Like
Doesn’t exist between consenting adults.
It’s not my business to promote “any sex act”, but I’ll definitely stand up for everyone’s right to have sex however they want.
Nice to see that you’ve tipped your hand and have shown that you’re willing to punish people for doing things that don’t affect you at all.
I may not support bringing in skat-fetish presenters, but it’s still wrong to persecute them, and you won’t find me doing that.
Do you think gay or straight people are invited into schools to perform sex acts? Because if you do, then you’re perhaps the most ignorant and intellectually dishonest person I’ve ever met. This tshirt isn’t a sex act, and it only threatening to christians because they consider any amount of “different than me” to be scary and sinful.
Your bigotry knows no limits, and is a testament to tribalistic thinking.
It’s only an oxymoron if you think that gay people are liars. In fact, most christians would have that phrase much better applied to themselves, seeing as how their whole philosophy is based on fear, shame and judgement. Coming from a mindset that humans are evil and sick for just existing.
Gosh what a wonderful god you have, to knowingly have chosen to create a world that makes him murderously enraged, just so he can kill and punish and torture for all eternity.
Your religion is what’s actually hypocritical here, condemning those who hurt no one, while forgiving murderers and rapists for all the pain they caused others. Doesn’t it seem kind of evil that your god will forgive the most evil people in the world of their sins, while never doing anything to make the victims whole again? Because that’s pretty fucked up as far as I can tell.
6 Likes
Actually I have quite a sense of humor. I’m extremely amused by you calling me “sanctimonious” when you’re the one who’s accused others of not meeting your moral standards. It makes it even funnier that you’re not even willing to live up to those moral standards yourself. According to you Christians aren’t supposed to make false accusations against others. I guess you’re not a Christian then. Or is there a Biblical verse that says it’s okay to make false accusations if you follow it with a smiley face?
6 Likes
I find your lack of logic disturbing.
8 Likes
[Citation needed]
6 Likes
and before your twisted mind kicks into gear, I’m not dogging, that’ll be your department, probably
I’ve add emphasis to show how you’re now attempting to back away from your accusation. When you find yourself in a hole the smart thing is to stop digging, especially when it’s a hole of your own making.
Please keep being sanctimoniousness, though. Your claim to the moral high ground is hilarious.
2 Likes
Certainly, see the message by LDoBe - he/she endorses “skat-fetish” and everything else.
What does one person’s comment have to do with
3 Likes
You were supposed to find the joke funny - the whole sentence was part of the same joke - I know its beyond you, but try to keep up
You’re conflating endorsement with neutrality. I don’t endorse any sex acts. They’re fun enough for people figure out on their own, and don’t need specific publicity.
What I am endorsing, is consenting people’s right to do what ever they want with each other as long as nobody ends up dead, and even in some cases that’s acceptable too (End of life decisions, right to die with dignity).
5 Likes
Trust me, I’m way ahead of you. You came here to pick a fight and now you’re trying to mask your loss with sarcasm. You could have saved yourself the trouble by knowing the facts before you started commenting. Please don’t project your own ignorance onto others. It’s almost as unbecoming as lecturing others about moral standards you yourself lack.
4 Likes
Mod note: Jo_Fairley didn’t taste too good.
15 Likes
Is there a rationale for the end date of the suspension?
1 Like
It’s the longest I could suspend him for.
9 Likes
“Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out” *looks down at watch*
“Sipowicz, 10:42”
3 Likes
This stuck out for me. Are you saying that someone who does not wish to have sex is a problem for you too? How is that divisive? Who are you, to have so much concern over how much sex people you’ve never met are having or not having?
Seriously, you’ve just admitted that you have a problem with sex. That’s the issue. That’s why it’s wrong. The t-shirt has made you think about sex.
It made me think about rainbows.
9 Likes
Do you believe the government should make it illegal to name a baby Richard or Harry? Should Mr. Ballcock be legally required to change his surname? What about those of us who find the name Fairley offensive? (snerk) Can we make you change it, or at least have to block it out with a black Sharpie anywhere it is written?
Did you really mean to argue that someone cannot name their own company after themselves if you don’t like their name?
5 Likes
And yet the public school system in the United States was started by the Christians in the original 13 colonies.
I guess that’s why you don’t want to go into the history…it proves you’re lying.
6 Likes
You are lying. These people do not exist, and you do not know them. I’m so sick of people like you, who keep telling the same lies over and over again because they SOOO want them to be true.
3 Likes
I’ll like this, because you came up with a rationale that I hadn’t considered even if it’s coming from a christian.
I never would have guessed you are one, but that’s not my sticking point. You use humanist reasoning based in reality, rather than hate and fear based rants from an ancient book written by bronze age nomads who had little to no ability to understand the world around them.
In other words, you surprise me @Mister44, in an interesting way. 
ETA:
I hope this comes off as a compliment because I don’t mean to be hurtful to you, just that I can’t help but point out that the bible itself is completely authoritarian, but the authorities who wrote it couldn’t possibly have known jow to be relevant to the people 4000-2000 years in the future.
